For: Terrance Sanders
“HOW
TO KNOW THE ONLY
TRUE GOD - KNOWING GOD THROUGH
CHRIST, JESUS “
Quote
by: Terrance Sanders ACS
Degree Theology.
J. Rodman Williams, Ph.D.
Professor of Renewal Theology Emeritus
Regent University School of Divinity
Dr. J. Rodman Williams answers questions
from CBN.com readers like you!
1.
Theology –
Doctrine__________________________________________ 02
2.
Scripture, Knowledge of
God, Faith_____________________________ 05
3.
God, the Holy
Trinity_________________________________________ 08
4.
Creation, Providence,
Predestination, Angels...___________________ 15
5.
Man_______________________________________________________
21
6.
Sin, Death,
Satan____________________________________________ 24
7.
Christ -- Incarnation,
Atonement, Resurrection___________________ 30
8.
Salvation - Calling,
Regeneration, Justification___________________ 39
9.
Sanctification,
Perseverance__________________________________ 46
10.
The Holy
Spirit______________________________________________ 49
11.
Gifts of the Holy
Spirit________________________________________ 58
12.
Christian
Living_____________________________________________ 63
13.
Church and
Ministry_________________________________________ 67
14.
Baptism and the Lord's
Supper________________________________ 70
15.
The Second Coming of
Christ_________________________________ 76
16.
The Consummation - Last Judgement, Eternal Life________________ 80
Renewal Theology is the ordering and exposition of
all basic Christian beliefs as they relate to the contemporary spiritual
movement known as Pentecostal and Charismatic. Its major focus is the doctrine
of the Holy Spirit and spiritual gifts that are being renewed in our time. This
theology
is represented in part by my book Renewal Theology (3
volumes, now compiled into one single volume.)
1-2 Explain what is meant by an "argument from
silence." Should we build doctrine or theology based on the argument that
Scripture does not specifically address the particular point? For instance, our
pastor does not believe the Church should have youth ministries with a youth
pastor because there are no instances of them in the scripture.
The "argument from silence" is a specious
one. To be sure, the Church must always be faithful to the doctrines of
Christian faith but also be free under the guidance of the Holy Spirit for new
and different expressions.
1-3 Could you explain "Open Theism" and do you agree
with it?
"Open theism" is a contemporary view held
by an increasing number of theologians that the future is open to God. So, in
some sense, they affirm that He is not omniscient. A title of one popular
openness book is God Who Risks. The openness theologians believe that this view
also protects the
freedom of man because the future is not absolutely
fixed. In my view, openness theology makes God too small and man too large.
1-4 What is theology and what role should it play in the life of
a Christian?
Theology is sometimes called "the queen of the
sciences" because it deals with ultimate truth. Theology goes beyond all
sciences, however, in that its sphere is God and the world. Theology reflects
upon God's activity in creation, redemption, and new life. Since theology deals
with matters of
eternal significance, it should play an important
role in the life of a Christian.
1-5 Is theology as important as scripture, prayer, or religious
experience?
No. Theology occupies a secondary place to all three.
Theology, however, is based on Scripture, energized by prayer, and vitalized by
religious experience. As a result, the reflection of theology has its own
unique significance.
1-6 What is "liberation theology" that I keep hearing
about? Is it wrong or right?
"Liberation theology" represents a
movement, largely in
from inner oppression and bondage. "Liberation
theology," while concerned about the social plight of the poor and
oppressed, falls short in relating to the far profounder spiritual plight of
all people.
1-7 What is the difference between Reformed Theology and Renewal
Theology?
Reformed Theology refers generally to the theology of
the Protestant churches that broke away from Roman Catholicism in the sixteenth
century. More particularly the term Reformed Theology is used to refer to the
beliefs held by those churches influenced by John Calvin. Reformed Theology is
especially noted for its emphasis on the sovereignty
of God. Renewal Theology is interdenominational in nature. It is the ordering
of Christian beliefs as they relate to the contemporary spiritual movement
known as Pentecostal and Charismatic. Its major focus is the doctrine of the
Holy Spirit and spiritual gifts that are being
renewed in our time.
1-8 What is your view on end times theology?
Theology deals with all time-the beginning, the
present, and the future. We need to reflect on all three. An "end
times" concentration may lead to imbalance. However, a failure to treat
the end times is a serious neglect
1-9 What is "Five Point Calvinism"?
The so-called "Five Point Calvinism" is
contained in the acronym TULIP: T-Total depravity, U-Unconditional election,
L-Limited atonement, I-Irresistible grace, P-Perseverance of the saints.
Arminianism, incidentally, modifies especially these last four
points by affirming conditional election, universal atonement, resistible
grace, and the possibility of apostasy.
"Five Point Calvinism" is held traditionally by those in
Reformed and Presbyterian churches.
1-10 I know the Lord's Prayer is in the Bible, but where did the
Apostles' Creed
come
from? Is it biblically based? Where is the support for the statements
"He
descended into hell" and "the communion of saints"?
The Apostles' Creed goes back to approximately A.D.
700, although segments of it are found as early as the second century. This
creed was not written by the apostles, but is generally recognized as being
faithful to their teaching. The statement "He descended into hell"
was added to the original Creed some years later and has not been universally
accepted. It is omitted in many versions of the Creed. However, the statement
vividly expresses the full extent of Christ's vicarious sacrifice, even
suffering the torment of hell for all peopleThe
"Communion of saints" in the Creed refers to the
fellowship of believers. It is not a communion with
saints in heaven (a common misunderstanding) but of saints on earth at all
times and in all places.
It is a theological discipline that presents
argumentation and evidences for the validity of Christian faith. Peter writes:
"Always…(be) ready to make a defense [Greek-apologia] to every one who
asks you to give an account for the hope that is in you" (1 Peter
demolish arguments and every pretension that sets
itself up against the knowledge of God, and we take captive every thought to
make it point to Christ" (2 Corinthians 10:5 NIV). The intention of
apologetics is to provide, in so far as possible, a rational defense of the
Christian faith. Apologetics is directed to the world of unbelief and attempts
to establish certain aspects of Christian faith-for example, the veracity of
Scriptures, the existence of God, and the immortality of the soul-as true on
the basis of rational and empirical evidence.
1-12 What is the function of theology?
There are basically five functions: clarification,
integration, correction, declaration, and challenge. I describe hereafter the
first two.
It is important to set forth as clearly as possible
what it is that the Christian community affirms. This is primarily for the
benefit of persons in the community who need instruction in the faith. Often
there is lack of understanding in various doctrinal areas. Participation in
Christian experience is, of course, the primary thing, but this does not
automatically bring about full understanding. Much further instruction is
needed in order that increasing clarification of truth may occur. It is a sad
fact that many Christians are quite unclear about what they believe. They
need-and often want-instruction about the contents of the faith. They are
calling out for more adequate teaching. This is the task that theology is
called to perform. Integration Theology should help bring it all together by
integrating one truth with
another. Theology is not only a matter of
clarification of individual doctrines but also the emonstration
of how these fit into a total pattern.In the teaching
of theology there is the continuing effort to show how one part relates to
another. For many Christians there is need for integration of their Bible
reading and study into a unified picture of truth. The Old and New Testaments
in many areas of doctrine are not easy to relate to each other. This is also
the case of relating the teaching of individual books to one another. There is
also need among many Christians for integrating the truth they have received
with various aspects of their own experience. This is true both in relation to
their own Christian experience and their day-by-day experience of the world
around them. They are largely ignorant of how it all fits together.
2. Scripture, Knowledge of God, Faith
2-1
Is there such a doctrine called "Sola
Scriptura" -- that the Bible is the sole/final
authority of divine revelation? If so, could you show where in Scripture does
it literally state that "the Bible is the sole/final authority of revelation?"
"All Scripture is inspired by God" (2
Timothy
anything else -- can occupy this singular position.
2-2
Which version of the Bible is most accurate and true to the
original documents? Is it true that the modern versions of Scripture, such as
NIV and NASB, are leaving out important words and phrases that diminish the
deity and Lordship of Christ?
I find both NIV (New International Version) and NASB
(New American Standard Bible) to be helpful modern translations. The NASB is
the more literal of the two, but the NIV is easier to read. Neither of these
translations in any way diminishes the deity and Lordship of Christ.
2-3
I've been reading your answers to the predestination
questions, but I'm still having a hard time with God "hardening"
Pharaoh's heart when Moses went to Pharaoh again and again to ask for freedom.
Obviously it allowed for many miracles to be seen, but was that the only reason
for hardening his heart?
Although Scripture says several times that God
hardened Pharaoh's heart, it also states that Pharaoh hardened his own heart
(see Exodus, chapters 7-9). Perhaps you have heard the saying, "The same
sun that hardens clay melts wax." Ponder this in relation to the hardening
of Pharaoh's heart.
2-4
I have heard many theologians quickly dismiss the dictation
theory of inspiration. Is it possible that this theory is correct?
A dictation theory of inspiration assumes that every
word of Scripture was given directly by God. The human writer was no more than
a secretary who transcribed the words given. This is far too mechanical a view
of inspiration. Dictation would imply no human element. To be sure, dictation
would apply in many places (for example, the Ten
Commandments), but almost everywhere the biblical record gives evidence of
unerring human input. This may be called a dynamic view of inspiration.
2-5
I noticed your article on your web site defending Scripture as
being inspired. I noticed that in your discussion of "all Scripture"
you did not address extra-biblical writings. I consider the Asian cultures who
have been fed from their scriptures for thousands of years and view what we
consider Scripture through their lens. To not acknowledge that their scriptures
contain truth closes communication. I would be thankful for any response.
My "all Scripture" discussion deliberately
did not address extra-biblical writings whatever their merit. I do not believe
them to be on the same level of inspiration. All Scripture, Paul says, is
"inspired [God-breathed]" (2 Timothy
2-6
How should I respond from a Bible perspective to a friend who
believes that all truth is relative?
A simple but profound answer is what Jesus said:
"I am the way, and the truth, and the life" (John 14:6). Not "a
way." Not "a truth." Not "a life." There is nothing
relative about the truth in Christ.
2-7
How do we convince people that Scriptures are genuine accounts
and not, as some assert, merely stories?
One answer to this question lies in archeological
findings that increasingly confirm the accuracy of scriptural data. Many names
and places in the Bible that for a long time were viewed by some as
non-existent (
Nelson Glueck, writes:
"It can be stated categorically that no archeological discovery has ever controverted a biblical reference." The Bible contains
genuine historical accounts throughout.
2-8
I have often heard the statement that the Bible is
"verbally inspired." What does that mean?
Verbal inspiration is the term frequently employed to
attest that each individual part of the Bible is God's word. The Holy Spirit
superintended the writing of Scripture down to the last details. Paul speaks of
imparting truth "not in words taught by human wisdom, but those taught by
the Spirit"
(1 Corinthians 2:13). Thus the Scriptures while
written by men and in human words are God's word in writing. They are verbally
inspired.
2-9
How can I prove to non-believers that God exists?
One cannot prove this. Rather "he who comes to
God must believe that He is, and that He is a rewarder
of those who diligently seek Him" (Hebrews 11:6). Faith precedes
knowledge-the eyes of faith receive what goes beyond mind and reason. There are
evidences of God in nature (see Romans
2-10
What is the meaning and value of so-called "natural
theology?
Natural theology is the effort to build a doctrine concerning
the knowledge of God without appeal to special revelation in the Bible by
utilizing only the data that may be drawn from nature, human existence,
history, etc. Such natural theology may be intended as a substitute for
revealed theology
(theology grounded in special revelation) or as
providing a kind of rational base therefor. In either
event, the premise of natural theology is that there is a certain basic and
objective knowledge of God that can be explicated, and that any rational person
who is willing to think clearly will arrive at this truth.
Thus natural theology, while admitting limits in what
it can accomplish, claims to have positive value. Especially, so it is said, is
this needed in a world that gives priority to reason over revelation.
In reply, natural theology fails to recognize two
basic things. First, a person's knowledge at best is disproportionate to the
knowledge of God: he may have ideas about God, but they are no more than human
constructs extrapolated into infinity. Hence, man's knowledge capacity is
insufficient to arrive at a full knowledge of God.
Second, though there is a general revelation of God
in nature, humanity and history, it is so perverted through mankind's
sinfulness that people's minds are futile and incapable of discerning what God
is disclosing. If people were godly and righteous, then surely what God
discloses through general revelation could affords a basis for natural
theology.
But since they have turned from God, they cannot know
God through natural understanding. It should also be added, however, that when
God comes to mankind in His special revelation and a person truly receives it,
then his eyes are once more opened to the knowledge of God in the universe,
human existence, and all of history. It is ultimately only the person who has
faith who can cry out, "The heavens are telling the glory of God."
Hence Christian theology is not based on natural theology but is based on
special revelation, which will include far more than anything that natural
theology could ever attempt.
3-1 My friend posed this question to me the other day. I would
like your response. Does God need help from us?
God has need of nothing. He is the All-Sufficient
One. Thus He is our helper in every situation and circumstance. This does not
call for less zeal on our part but living and acting with the assurance that
God is already there to help in whatever is needed. "God is a very present
help," says the Psalmist
(Psalm 46:1). What is there to fear?
3-2 To me, some people (including many clergy) misunderstand the
mystery of theTrinity by thinking that in heaven we shall
only see one personality representing God and Jesus. In my understanding,
however, we shall see both God the Father and Jesus Christ to whom the Father
has given all power.
I would only add that we will also see
God the Holy Spirit, the third person of the Godhead. As one of our best known
hymns puts it, "God in three persons, blessed Trinity." The mystery
of the Trinity is beyond our understanding: not two persons but three. The Holy
Spirit is a unique person and hard to visualize, but He is as much God as the
other two.
Praise God the Father, God the Son, and
God the Holy Spirit!
3-3 God is omnipotent and omniscient. Therefore, when He puts
you through tribulations in life, does He know that you will endure to the end
or give up eventually?
Since God is both omnipotent and
omniscient, He knows who will endure to the end or give up. His knowledge and
power does not, however, mean that He is responsible for our actions. God sovereignly overrules our destiny without coercing it.
3-4 If God is the Alpha and Omega, the First and Last, He knows
who will do what, and before people are born He will know who will go to heaven
or hell. So if He knows who's going to hell, then why create them?
Though God knows all things including our
future, this does not determine our destiny. We are free to make our own
choices over which God's sovereignly rules.
3-5 Some people teach that "God needs permission"
before He can do anything on the earth. "God gave dominion to Adam,"
they say, "so God can't do anything without man's permission." This
seems to contradict so many scriptures! Surely God's authority is not
subordinate to man's authority. God isn't on a leash, is He? Please, I would
appreciate a candid, clear answer to this question! Is this a false teaching?
A false teaching indeed. It undercuts the
appreciation of God as almighty. The fact that God gave dominion to Adam over
the earth does not diminish God's sovereignty. God does not need man's
permission to do anything. This would be tantamount to making man into God.
Perish the thought!
3-6 Throughout the OT and NT God has always been exalted as
"one." The "trinity" theory is contrary to the Bible. Many
scriptures such as 1 Timothy
The basic thing to realize is that the
apostles experienced God as Father, Son, and Holy Spirit in their lives and
ministry. They came to recognize God as Father in their daily contact with
Jesus, God as Son in the presence of Jesus, and God as Holy Spirit through the
experience of Pentecost. The
Trinity is more than doctrine. It was and
is to enter into a life-changing experience. None of this diminishes the fact
that God is one.
3-7 I am a Christian and was stunned the other day when a friend
told me that there is not one scripture in the Bible that says there is such a
thing as the Trinity. She said the Trinity was started by the Catholic Church
many years ago. I've prayed and searched, but need your help to find scripture
validating my belief in the Trinity.
Let me give you two verses-and there are
many others-that validate Christian belief in the Trinity. First, there are
Jesus' own words in Matthew 28:19: "Go therefore and make disciples of all
the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy
Spirit." Second, there are
Paul's words in 2 Corinthians 13:14:
"The grace of the Lord Jesus Christ, and the love of God, and the
fellowship of the Holy Spirit, be with you all." Incidentally, the
Catholic Church did not start the doctrine of the Trinity.
3-8 Where did God come from? We know so much about His
characteristics and how He wants us to live, but where did He come from?
God is the everlasting God. He is without
beginning or ending. Human beings are temporal creatures whose days on earth
are limited in number. With God there is no such limitation. Thus does God
transcend everything in His creation. God is the great "I am." He
speaks to Moses: "Say this to the people of
3-9 In Genesis 1:26, it reads, "And God said, Let us make
man in our image, after our likeness." What is meant by "Let us"
and "in our"? To whom is "us" and "our" referring
in this passage?
The "us" and the
"our" points to a plurality within God. God is one as the only God
but exists as threefold: God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit.
The mystery of the Trinity is strongly intimated at this early stage in the
Bible. Note that a plurality of persons is also suggested in
Genesis
3-10 Even before He created heaven and earth or man and woman, God
has always been. My husband and I both have wondered before this creation what
God did all by Himself? We have always been curious but have never gotten a
good answer.
God was never alone even before His act
of creation. In the mystery of the Trinity, God always existed as three
persons: God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit. As such, in the
one God there is fellowship eternally. In that sense, the one God is a society
of persons. Yet each person is the one and only God. Love is the very nature of
God. Each person of the Godhead eternally loves one another. This is all true
long before there was a creation.
3-11 Why did God blind the Jews (John
The "blinding" of the Jews was
not an arbitrary action on God's part but rather the result of their turning
from His revelation in Christ. Jesus Himself gave them ample opportunity to
receive the word but in general they refused.
3-12 Some Christians pray to God the Father, praying in the name
of Jesus the Son. Other Christians pray to Jesus. Whom should we address in our
prayers? Some Christians say that The Lord's Prayer is our instruction in this.
But Jesus was still with the apostles when He instructed them to pray "Our
Father..." He couldn't have told them to pray to Him when He was still
there. So this instruction doesn't seem to apply to Christians today.
Since God is Triune -- Father, Son, and
Holy Spirit -- we may equally well pray to any of the three. One helpful way is
to pray to the Father through the Son and in the Holy Spirit: to God as our
Creator, our Redeemer, and our Sanctifier.
3-13 How can we absolve God of responsibility when the facts are
as we apparently know them to be? We understand God to be all knowing, past,
present and future, as well as being the Creator. That being the case, God had
to know in advance what the result of creating man would be. I understand God's
love and man's free will, but how can we absolve God of responsibility when the
facts are as we apparently know them to be? It seems like if there is an
original sinner here, it would be God Himself. Don't you agree?
No, I do not agree. God truly knows in
advance but is in no way responsible for sin. Sin originates in the freedom God
gave man and angels. God is sovereign over the creatures' freedom but in no way
coerces it. God knows the past, present, and future in detail, but such
knowledge is not the same
as responsibility for what happens.
3-14 If God is omnipotent how come he can't do evil?
Because God is altogether holy;
therefore, He will not do anything that contradicts His character. God is
totally without sin. God the Almighty One is also God the All Holy One. In His
omnipotence, He can do everything consonant with His holy nature and nothing in
contradiction.
3-15 If God is sovereign, but I must choose His plan of
salvation, then who is in control of my destiny? God or me? If the answer is
me, then is God sovereign?
In answer to your question, you must bear
in mind the paradox between God's sovereignty and man's response. Both are
included in a true understanding of salvation. It is a paradox because it seems
contradictory to speak thus of a divine-human relationship. However, God and
man are not on the same level. God remains sovereign throughout. Man remains
responsible for his actions.
3-16 Recently I had a non-Christian friend ask, "Who created
God?" I tried to explain to her the best I could, but I think she left
even more confused. How would you answer such a question?
In Isaiah 40:28 are the words about God
where He is described as "the Everlasting God, the Lord, the creator of
the ends of the earth." God as creator is everlasting. If the creator were
not everlasting, there would always remain the question, "Who created the
Creator?" God is the great "I AM" (Exodus
There is mystery here to be sure, but
unless God is everlasting creation could not exist. · We know God is a triune entity,
can there be any intellectual conceptualization of His nature or must we accept
the Trinity on faith? Intellectual conceptualization of God as triune-one being
in three persons-is limited because we are reaching beyond what the human mind
can comprehend.
A material analogy, sometime drawn, is
that of the one substance water which exists in three forms as liquid, ice, and
steam. However, God is all three forms at the same time, and every form is a
person. A frequent human analogy is that of man as the union in one being of
body, soul, and spirit; however, God is both one being and three persons.
Perhaps a better analogy is that of a
human family consisting of father, mother, and child, thus three persons;
however, the three persons are not one being. All such analogies are
inadequate. We must accordingly turn to Scripture and Christian experience.
Scripture bears witness both to God as one (Deuteronomy. 6:4, Mark
Further, in a full Christian experience,
we are aware of there being only one God but also three persons, Father, Son,
and Holy Spirit each of whom is wholly God. Thus it is not only a matter of
accepting the Trinity on faith, but also of Scripture witness and the
confirmation in Christian experience.
3-17 Each member of the Godhead has theological significance;
what is their
relation
to us and to each other?
In regard to the three members of the
Godhead and their relation to us, God the Father is the Creator, God the Son
the Redeemer, God the Holy Spirit the Sanctifier. In each case the other two
persons are also active (for example, the Father creates through the Son and by
the Holy Spirit), for God is one in being. We can say little about the inner
relation of the persons of the Trinity to one another. However, since God is
love (1 John 4:8), there must be the deepest possible relationship of love
uniting Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.
3-18 Does evil in the world preclude the existence of God? It has
been said that evil in the world precludes the existence of God, or at least
takes away from His divine nature. Is this reasoning flawed and if so, why?
Evil in the world does not preclude the
existence of God, but it might seem to preclude the existence of a holy and
righteous God. God, however, is not the source of evil. It is the result of the
sin of angels first, then man, who in the freedom God gave them were
disobedient to Him and thereby brought evil into God's creation.
3-19 Could you explain the term "begotten" found in the
Scriptures and in various creeds as applied to the Second Person of the
Trinity?
Jesus is described as "only
begotten" (Greek, monogenes) in John
an eternal begetting: there was never a
time when the Son did not exist, for He is also God. In John 1:18
He is described as "the only
begotten God, who is in the bosom of the Father." In the mystery of the
Trinity, both Father and Son (and the Holy Spirit) are the one and only God;
however, along with
this essential identity there is a
distinction of personhood; one God in three persons.
The Nicene Creed speaks of "the one
Lord Jesus Christ, the only begotten of the Father before all time…true God of
true God, begotten not created, of the same essence as the Father." As
"only begotten," Christ is
secondary to the Father, hence the Second Person of the Trinity; but as
"true God of true God" He is as fully God as the Father: both are the
one and only God.
3-20 Does God's omnipresence include hell and the lake of fire?
Hell is sometimes described in the Bible
as a place of "outer darkness" (Matthew
3-21 Why does God let bad things happen?
I
have some friends who just lost their 3-week-old baby daughter due to a heart
defect. If God is sovereign why would he let this happen? I know the Bible says
so that His glory can be shown. It seems to me with my limited human knowledge
to be a rather cruel way to show His glory. How can one keep from coming to the
conclusion that they should blame God for taking her away? I do not believe
Satan took her. She was being lifted up in prayer all over the world.
There is no simple answer to your
question. God and His ways are often mysterious. The words of Job may be
helpful: "The Lord gave and the Lord has taken away. Blessed be the name
of the Lord." (Job
God in His power and love could have
saved His own Son on the cross, but in the mystery of His divine purpose He did
not. Should we blame God for allowing His Son to die? No, through an innocent
death God fulfilled His purpose. Likewise, we must trust God in an innocent
baby's death to be fulfilling His mysterious purpose. We may not know why, but
we do trust him.
3-22 How does God's unchanging nature and His repentance relate
to each other?
God is One who does not change. The
universe is constantly undergoing a transition from one stage to another and
human existence is marked by continuing alteration. With God there is no such
mutability. "For I the LORD do not change" (Malachi 3:6). Thus does
God transcend everything in His
creation. God is the Rock. He does not
fluctuate from one event to the next.
There is constancy and stability in all
that He is and does. Hence, he is not evolving from one stage to another. There
is no movement from some "primordial" nature to a
"consequent" nature in any aspect of His being. God is not a becoming
God, a growing God. God does not change. He is "the Father of lights with
whom there is no variation or shadow due to change [literally "with
whom…change has no place"] (James
God, whether Father or Son or Spirit, is
One who changes not. In God there is dependability and constancy in His being,
acts, and purposes. The Old Testament sometimes speaks of God as
"repenting" or changing His mind (e.g., Exodus 32:14). From the
overall picture, the outward "repentance" does not signify a change
in God's activity, but only His dependable response to man's behavior. God
invariably acts the same: when man is obedient, God blesses; when man disobeys,
God punishes; when man confesses his sin, God forgives. He "repents";
that is, He turns in the other direction.
Hence, God's repentance is not really a
change in God, but it is His bringing to bear on the human situation some other
aspect of His being and nature. God remains the same throughout. It is
important not to view God changelessness as that of hard, impersonal
immobility. God is not like a statue, fixed and cold, but, quite the contrary,
He relates to people. He is not the "unmoved Mover" but constantly
moves upon and among men and nations.
The flux and flow of life are not far
away and far beneath Him. Indeed, He freely involved Himself in the life of a
fickle and inconstant people to work out His purpose, and in the Incarnation he
plunged totally into the maelstrom of human events. God in His own
changelessness has experienced all the vicissitudes of human existence. This is
the God-far from immobile and distant-who does not change.
3-23 What is meant by "the glory of God"?
The climactic word to be spoken about God
is that He is the God of Glory. The Scriptures abound with their declaration of
the glory of God. In the Psalms are found, for example, such expressions as
these: His glory is "above the heavens" (8:1); "the heavens
declare the glory of God" (19:1 KJV); "the LORD of hosts, he is the
King of glory!" (24:10); "be exalted, O God, above the heavens! Let
thy glory be over all the earth!" (57:5); "the LORD…will appear in
his glory" (102:16); "his glory is above earth and heaven"
(148:13).
But this is only a beginning; God's glory
is attested throughout Scripture.
What then, is the glory of God? Perhaps
the best answer is that the divine glory is the radiant splendor and awesome
majesty of God Himself. Glory is not so much a particular attribute but the
effulgence of splendor and majesty that shines through in every aspect of God's
being and action.
Man, it should now be added, finds his highest
fulfillment in relation to the divine glory.
There is a deep desire in human nature to
break through the limitations of finitude and to behold God as He is in
Himself. Moses on one occasion cried out to God, "I pray thee, show me thy
glory" (Exodus 33:18). Despite all that Moses had seen of God, he yearned
to go yet higher and further. When Christ came to earth, says the fourth
Gospel, "we…beheld his glory, glory as of the only Son from the
Father" (John
But even for those who know Christ in
this life, there is yet the consummation of glory in the world to come. For
there at long last, the profoundest yearning of mankind to see God Himself will
be gloriously fulfilled: "they shall see his face" (Revelation 22:4)
throughout eternity! God is the God of glory. Let us ever live to the praise of
that glory.
3-24 Explain John
This
was put to me recently and I couldn't explain it and wish to understand it so I
could explain it to others. It concerns Jesus' statement in John 14:28,
"If you loved me, you would be glad that I am going to the Father, for the
Father is greater than I." How is this to be understood when we believe in
the Trinity with all persons being God?
In order to answer, Jesus' words in John
14:28, "the Father is greater than I," may be compared with His words
in John
Does John
Greatness does not mean that God the
Father is more divine in the Trinity than the Son, but that in personal
relationship they exist in mutual reciprocity of giving and receiving. This is
not unlike the relationship of earthly fathers and sons in which the priority
belongs to the father rather
than the son. Finally, we may rejoice in
both statements of Jesus: "I and the Father are one" and "the
Father is greater than I." Both are important to maintain in a truly
biblical understanding of the Triune God.
4. Creation - Providence, Predestination, Angels
4-1 Are we predestined ... chosen by God ... to become
believers?
There is a proper way to put it. Rather
than to say that we are predestined to become believers, we should say that we
are predestined as believers. There are always two sides interchangeable: God
and faith, God's sovereign action and our choice.
4-2 What do you think about a devotion to St. Michael the
call
on his help when we are faced with it?
Since the Christian worships the triune
God---God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit---all of whom are
available to our intercession, what need we more? Indeed, though Michael is an
angel of the highest order, he is still a finite creature. He ought not to be
worshiped or invoked in
prayer.
4-3 If we have free will and choice, how can we be predestined
and chosen
(Romans
While predestination and free will seem
logically contradictory to each other, from God's perspective they are not.
They are actually complementary. God predestines through the free choice of people.
This is a part of the mystery of how God works with man. For example, if God
predestines my
salvation, my freedom of choice comes
into play. God is sovereign and therein human choices are confirmed.
4-4 Many times the Bible says that God has chosen certain
individuals ahead of time to be His flock (sheep versus goats). Does it explain
why He's done this in the Bible? What happens to the people who were never
drawn to Him?
The words of Jesus in Matthew 22:14 are
quite relevant, "For many are called, but few are chosen." This does
not mean an arbitrary choice in regard to those chosen; rather the call is
unlimited, and those who say "yes" are the chosen ones. Thus they are
"God's chosen" by their own decision in answer to God's call. God's
desire is to draw all people to Himself.
4-5 I am a Christian and believe in God's love for mankind. But
I have for a long time now been bothered by this question: why did God create
mankind? The Bible tells us that God is perfect and complete unto Himself, so
God couldn't have needed mankind, either as partners in love or as worshippers.
Can you please explain why God created mankind?
You are right. God did not create mankind
to satisfy Himself---as if God were a lonely God and therefore needed
fellowship with some created being. God being love desired human creatures to
share that love in fellowship with Himself and with one another.
4-6 If God is perfect, if heaven is perfect, then why did so
many angels rebel against God?
Among the highest perfections of all God's
creatures is the freedom of the will. This applies to angels as well as human
beings. Freedom of the will also includes the possibility of rebelling against
God. Actually, if there were no freedom of the will the situation would be less
than perfect.
4-7 When dinosaurs lived, were humans there?
My
nine-year-old son asked me this. If God made Adam and Eve and the earth, how
come when the dinosaurs lived no humans were alive? I didn't have an answer. Is
this something you could help me answer? Will I find this information in the
Bible?
According to Genesis 1, all the animals
were made before Adam and Eve. Verse 25 reads, "And God made the beasts of
the earth after their kind, and the cattle after their kind, and everything
that creeps on the ground after its kind; and God saw that it was good. The
beasts of the earth surely included
dinosaurs alongside other creatures. The
next verse speaks of God making man, "Let us make man in our image."
Thus dinosaurs existed before man was created. It was a good world that God
made.
4-8 If God has a plan for everyone and knows what is best for
us, why do we pray? Certainly it is not for Him to change His mind. Should we
just pray to be strong enough to handle whatever is in God's plan then? Is it
possible for us to sway God's plans?
We need to pray so that we might know
what His will is and to receive strength and direction to carry it out. This
applies to God's overall purpose and our daily activities. It is not a matter
of seeking to sway God's plans, but to give glad and grateful obedience to
whatever His will may be.
4-9 Are certain people (like Adolph Hitler) damned to hell from
birth? If life is predetermined from birth, then could it be that certain
people (like Adolph Hitler) are born damned to hell from birth?
God, to be sure, is in sovereign control
over every human life, but He does not thereby determine our actions. Freedom
to decide is an essential element in human nature, "Man is that Entity
Made to be Free". Hitler (like Judas in Acts
4-10 What is predestination taught by Calvinism and by Arminianism? And what does it have to do with salvation?
Both Calvinism and Arminianism
affirm predestination in relation to salvation: those who believe do so as a
result of God's prior decision and action. Both agree with the words of Paul,
"Whom He predestined, these He also called; and whom He called, these He
also justified; and whom He
justified, these He also glorified" (Romans
Arminianism goes back to Romans 8:29 that begins,
"Whom He foreknew, He also predestined," and holds that God's act of
predestination depends on His foreknowledge of those who will believe. On that
basis, He predestines them to salvation. Calvinism stresses that salvation is
the result of God's decision prior to our faith; it is in no way based on our
believing. Arminianism, to the contrary, holds that
only those who believe are predestined to salvation.
4-11 Why did God, who is Love, create us all knowing that many
would go to hell?
I think and believe that God (the only
Creator) sent us His Son to be Christ our Savior. I also believe that He knew
how every individual person would end up in the End. Why then did He go ahead
and create us all knowing that most people were going to hell with Satan and his
angels. I say that on the
basis of the Scripture that says that God
is love.
I don't believe I would do so with that
knowledge and power of those I love. Maybe I just don't understand what love
is. God in creating us foreknew that sin, death, and hell would eventuate.
Where then is God's love? It lies in the marvelous fact that He determined in
Christ to pay the cost. Christ on the cross accordingly suffered the eternal
punishment that is mankind's due, with the terrible darkness, its fiery pain,
and total abandonment by God.
With the cry of agony, "My God, My
God, why hast Thou forsaken Me?" (Mark
tortures of condemned and ruined
man." Thus hell is no reality foreign to God in that He has already
experienced the worst that any person will have to endure. This truly is love
beyond all comprehension.
4-12 How do we reconcile that God has His will for us, but He
also says to ask anything in Jesus' name and it will be done for us?
To pray "in Jesus' name" is not
a magical formula for answered prayers. It really means to pray in the same
spirit as Jesus prayed who always did the Father's will. We should only ask for
those things that God Himself wills for us. Jesus sometimes struggled to know
the Father's will-how much more
we-but He always discovered it. Praying
in Jesus' name is a challenging and exciting adventure!
4-13 How are we to understand the "six days" of
creation?
According to Genesis 1:1-2:4, the process
of creation occurred over a six-day period. The most obvious understanding of
the days would be that of six or seven 24-hour periods, in other words, what we
know as the 24-hour calendar day. Such a reading is possible but, upon careful
scrutiny, rather unlikely.
The word "day" itself is used
in several different ways in the Genesis 1:1-2:4 passage. First, it refers to
the light that was separated from darkness: "God called the light Day, and
the darkness he called Night" (1:5). Second, it refers to light and
darkness together: "And there was evening and there
was morning, one day" (also 1:5).
Third, it refers to all the days together: "These are the generations of
the heavens and of the earth when they were created, in the day that the LORD
God made the earth and the heavens" (2:4 KJV).
This last statement is a summary of the
"generations" (literally, "begettings"),
which seems to refer to all that has preceded over the six days, hence the word
"day" in this case covers the whole process of creation. That the
word "day" does not refer to a 24-hour calendar day also seems
apparent from the account of the sun and moon not being made until the fourth
day.
How could there be calendar days which equal
solar days, when the sun is not yet present to mark them out? Finally,
attention may be called to the New Testament statement that "with the Lord
one day is as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day" (2 Peter
3:8). From the evidence above it seems quite likely that "day"
represents a period of time, however short or long, in which God was
accomplishing something.
This seems to accord best also with
reflection upon the content of many of the six "days." Although God,
of course, could accomplish such acts as making all the plants and trees in one
calendar day, all the luminaries in the heavens on another, all the fish and
birds on another, all the beasts
and man on still another, it hardly seems
likely, nor even like God, who often works slowly over long periods of time.
Hence, in light of the internal evidence
the preferable interpretation is to view the six days of creation as periods of
time, even ages, in which God was bringing the process of creation to its
climax in man. Here we may look in the scientific direction, and note that
geological and biological data say much the same thing. It is now generally
recognized that prior to man's arrival on the scene there were lengthy periods
of time.
For example, vegetable life appeared long
before animal life, and animal life long before human life. Each of these
"days" could have been thousands or multiples of thousand years
(recall 2 Peter); the exact length is unimportant. The important thing is that
God completed a work during that period. Its completion therefore is the
completion of a day.
4-14 I would appreciate your discussing the words of Jesus in
John 14:12: "Truly, truly, I say to you, he who believes in Me, the works
that I do yet shall he do also; and greater works than these shall he do."
In John 14:12, Jesus says two
extraordinary things. First, those who believe in Him will also do the works
("works" equals miracles throughout the Gospel of John) that He did.
The works/miracles that Jesus had done to this point in the Fourth Gospel
include turning water into wine (John 2), the healing
of an official's son by simply speaking a
word (John 4), the curing of a man long crippled and helpless (John 5), the
feeding of the five thousand (John 6), the giving of sight to a man born blind
(John 9), and climactically the raising of Lazarus from the dead (John 11).
Miracles in the believers' life
accordingly would include everything from turning water into wine to raising
the dead-and all in-between (as recorded not only in the Book of John but also
in the Synoptics). Now this, to say the least, is a
startling promise by Christ: those who believe in Him will do (not may do or
may possibly do) His works, His miracles. All miracles that Christ did in His
earthly ministry will be done by those who believe in Him. Second, and far more
startling, is the further declaration that those who believe in Him will also
do greater works than Christ did.
This unmistakably means works beyond
everything mentioned in the Gospels! Whatever miracles Jesus did on earth will
be transcended by the miraculous works of those who believe in Him. How is such
an astonishing thing possible? The answer is given in Jesus' own words:
"because I go to the Father." Jesus in heaven will have power and
authority far beyond what He had during His earthly ministry, and thereby He
will enable those who believe in Him to do greater works than even the greatest
that He had done within the confines of His own earthly existence.
In summary: not only will miracles
continue after Jesus' earthly ministry, but they will be even greater. And they
will be done not only by apostles, prophets, and the like, but also by others
who believe in Him. This accords well with Mark 16:7 that begins: "And
these signs [i.e., miracles] will accompany those who believe: in my name they
will cast out demons; they will speak in new tongues…." Those who believe
will do Christ's earthly works and even more through the entire age of the
proclamation of the gospel.
4-15 Should we expect visitations of angels in our time?
On the matter of experiencing angels, it
is probably wiser to speak more of their presence than of their visitation.
There were indeed visitations in biblical times, and they surely may occur at
any time again. But in the Scriptures the emphasis for the believer rests
mainly on the continuing presence of angels.
We observe this in statements about the
angels encamping around and guarding believers (Psalms 91:11-12), about
believers having angels who constantly behold the face of God (Matthew
(Hebrews
The emphasis is wrongly placed when the focus
is on angelic visitation; indeed, expecting, looking for, or hoping for such
visitors is nowhere encouraged in God's Word. We are rather to pray for and
expect, especially in our day, a greater
visitation of the Holy Spirit (that's where the action is!). And, as far as
angels are concerned, we may rejoice in their invisible but continuing
providential presence.
4-16 Do the words of Jesus in Luke 13:4-5 about the tower in
Siloam have relevance to our present crisis? "Those eighteen upon whom the
tower in Siloam fell and killed them, do you think they were worst offenders
than all the others who dwelt in
Jesus basically makes one point: The
unexpected falling of the tower is a call for repentance, not just with
eighteen but all other inhabitants of
The eighteen represent those for whom
repentance came too late. Thus they are a warning to all people to repent
before it is too late. Our present crisis calls for a renewed vigilance against
the foes of freedom and a heartfelt compassion for the thousands of casualties
and their families. The words of Jesus are a clarion call to deep repentance of
our nation that needs to return to God.
The words of 2 Chronicles 7:14 become
critical now, "If my people who are called by my name humble themselves,
and pray and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear
from heaven, and will forgive their sin and heal their land." Billy Graham
is quoted as saying, "If God does not judge
4-17 Explain to me the New Testament understanding of
predestination.
We may well begin by quoting the words in
Ephesians, "God chose us in Christ before the foundation of the world. In
love He predestinated us to adoption as sons through Jesus Christ to
Himself" (1:4-5 NASB). Hence, predestining points to the same prior action
of God, with the emphasis more particularly on God's sovereign action in
choosing.
Predestining also points more directly to
the end to which we are called. Later in Ephesians 1 Paul speaks of our
"having been predestined according to His purpose…to the end that
we…should be to the praise of His glory" (vv. 11-12). Having noted these
things-the broader meaning of God's sovereign action and the larger meaning of direction-we
now observe that the word "predestine" may serve for
"choose" or "elect." This is illustrated in Romans 8:28-30.
Paul first speaks of calling: "those…who are called according to His
[God's] purpose."
He then proceeds to say, "For those
whom he foreknew He also predestined to be conformed to the image of His Son….
And those whom He predestined He also called…." The end
of this sequence is glorification:
"Those whom He called He also justified; and those whom He justified He
also glorified." Again, both God's sovereign action is stressed-quite
strongly through the whole sequence of events-and the ultimate intention:
glorification.
It is important (in the light of many
misinterpretations) to observe that the word "predestinate" is never
used in the New Testament to refer to anything other than the arena of
salvation-as we have noted, adoption as sons, living to the praise of God,
glorification. Accordingly, a view of "double predestination"-a
predestination referring to death and damnation as well as to eternal life-has
utterly no basis in Scripture.
This does not mean that there is no death
or damnation, but such does not belong to God's predestining action, which
refers only to the general arena of salvation.
5. Man
5-1 Do we, as Christians, believe in the preexistence of the
soul?
The Bible does not teach the preexistence
of the soul or any other aspect of human nature. Once the soul is created,
however, it will never die.
5-2 From a biblical standpoint is there anything wrong with
being cremated versus a plot burial? Thank you for your guidance.
There is nothing wrong with cremation
since the body at death will not be the body of the coming resurrection-"it
[the body] is sown a material body, it is raised a spiritual body." So
whether the burial is cremation (or other disposal) is of no ultimate
consequence.
5-3 What is the difference between your soul and your spirit? And
when a Christian or a sinner dies, where exactly is the soul?
Spirit is the deepest aspect of human
nature. The spirit like God is eternal, thus never dies. According to
Ecclesiastes 12:5, "At death the dust will return to the earth as it was,
and the spirit will return to God who gave it." When Jesus died on the
cross He said, "Father, into Thy hands I commit My spirit" (Luke
Thus at death the soul may be said to
continue. Accordingly, the soul is not somewhere else than the spirit. There is
no "soul sleep" after death, as some have claimed, for either the
righteous or unrighteous.
5-4 Why does God give us free will to choose, but then punishes
us if we choose against His will? How can we love someone who created us
against our will, allowed sin to occur, and then threatens us into loving Him
or burn in flames?
Freedom to choose is a special mark of
human nature. If it is to be genuine freedom, there must also be the
possibility of wrong choice. Punishment inevitably follows from such a choice,
not as an arbitrary act of God, but as resulting from the way things are in a
moral universe. On the second question, I do not believe it is correct to say
that God created us against our will-our will was involved in His creative act.
God allowed sin to occur as a result of
the very freedom He gave us. Never does
He threaten us into loving Him, but shows
His great love for us in sending His only Son. As a result "we love Him
because He first loved us" (1 John 4:19 KJV). "Burning in
flames" is not a threat to force "us into loving Him"; love
cannot stem from a threat or be coerced. It is when we know that Christ
suffered the pains of hell ("burning") in God's great love that we
freely and gladly love in return.
5-5 Why did Eve tell a lie? When the serpent confronted Eve in
the garden, why did she say that God said, "You must not touch it, or you
will die" (Genesis 3:3) speaking of the tree of the knowledge of good and
evil. For God only said in Genesis 2:17, "You must not eat of the
tree…." Why did Eve tell a lie?
Eve's words were the result of Satan's
deception. The serpent (Satan's disguise) had just said to Eve, "Did God
say, 'You shall not eat from any tree of the garden?'" (Genesis 2:13).
These were very crafty words in that Satan was perverting God's earlier word
that referred to only one tree-"From
the tree of the knowledge of good and
evil you shall not eat."
Satan's question, subtly shifting from
the one tree that God had forbidden to any tree implied that if God were truly
good and just He would not have prohibited Adam and Eve from enjoying the good
fruit from all the trees in the garden.
What a malicious God, Satan is
insinuating, that would place you in this beautiful garden but not allow you to
enjoy its many fruits! Eve momentarily resisted the serpent by defending God,
"From the fruit of the trees of the garden we may eat," but then Eve
added, "But the fruit of the tree which is in the middle of the garden,
God has said, 'You must not eat from it or touch it lest you die.'"
Although Eve first of all defended God,
as deception grew she viewed the tree of the knowledge of good and evil as
being in the middle of the garden-which it was not. Earlier in Genesis the
Scripture speaks of "the tree of life being in the midst of the
garden" (2:9). Thus in Eve's mind, as Satan's deception worked its way,
what was forbidden became central and more and more alluring.
Then she, totally deceived, not only saw
the tree of the knowledge of good and evil as being in the midst of the garden
but also wrongly said that they were not allowed even "to touch it."
From there on Satan had the upper hand, bluntly contradicting God's words,
saying, "You shall not die" (Genesis 3:4) without so much as a
counter word from Eve.
5-6 Would you please explain the difference between soul and
spirit? When the Old/or New Testament uses the word "heart" does this
refer to our spirit or soul?
"Spirit" is the deepest
dimension of human nature. It is breathed into man by the breath of God
(Genesis 2:7) and is immortal. The soul results from the spirit functioning
through the body. It is man's conscious life in terms of mind, feeling, and
will. "Heart" is not a separate part but represents the inmost
thoughts and feelings of a person. It relates to both soul and spirit.
5-7 Please tell me your view of God's perspective of what women
should experience in childbirth. Do you believe that born again Christian women
who believe they have a covenant with God will experience pain in childbirth?
Hear the words of Genesis 3:16a: "To
the woman [Eve] He [God] said, "I will greatly multiply your pain in
childbirth. In pain you shall bring forth children." Listen also to Eve's
words in Genesis 4:1-"Eve gave birth to Cain, and she said, 'I have gotten
a manchild with the help of the Lord.'"
Her pain in giving birth to Cain is not so
much as mentioned in her joyous cry at the privilege of bringing forth a child
with the Lord's attending help. Pain could not erase her sense of victory. Yes,
you may experience some pain in childbearing, but you can also rejoice in the
Lord's real presence!
5-8 What is man's relationship to the animal world?
The opening chapter in Genesis describes
God's creation of the universe. The description climaxes in verse 26 with man
being seen as that creature who is between God and the world. He is "man the
amphibian"-existing between two realms. Although the animal world is a
creation of God and thus represents a totally new step ahead, it does not have
the unique stature of man. When God turned
to make man, He took still another step-a
huge one:
He made man in His image and likeness.
This by no means denies man's relationship to the animal world (any more than
the creation of animal life denies prior vegetable life), but it does give man
a unique status. He is a fresh creation and therefore not simply a higher or
more complex entity than what preceded him. This means that there is a
qualitative difference between man and the highest subhuman creature.
There is no gradual evolution of animal
into man by a series of steps over a lengthy period of time. Hence, there is no
"missing link" to be found, since God simply moved past the animal
kingdom and established a new order in creation. A further word might be said
about what preceded man. On the same sixth day "God made the beasts of the
earth according to their kinds" (Genesis 1:25).
There is no new creation here (as with
the first creation of life in the sea and sky [verse 21]), but a continuation
of animal life on a still higher level: this is a making, not a creation. Yet
the beasts of the earth (along with other land animals) are distinctive enough
from the preceding animal life to occupy a separate day of creation, namely,
the sixth and last.
Indeed this is the same day when man was
to be created. How much of the sixth day (or age) God devoted to the
"beasts of the earth" and whether He "made" these in one,
two, or ten thousand steps is not told us. He made them "according to
their kinds," and this can also allow development within their kind. Thus,
for example, there could be the development of the anthropoid ape to higher
levels within its "kind," but there is a qualitative gap between the
most highly developed ape and the appearance of man in creation.
This by no means rules out a close
biological relation to what God has just finished making, for man is the climax
and fulfillment of God's preceding work. But at a certain moment on the same
"sixth day," God reached beyond all that had preceded and created a
new being-man. There is continuity with the past but an even greater discontinuity:
man is a new creation.
5-9 I hear we are made in the image of God. Is God black or
white?
God is a spirit. He is beyond color. To
be made in the image of God refers o man's
distinctiveness. No animals are said in the Bible to be made in God's image.
The human spirit images God in its transcendent character.
6-1
What happens to a Christian person when he/she dies?
The spirit of the Christian believer at death
goes directly to be with the Lord in heaven. The body is resurrected on the
Last Day when Christ returns.
6-2
I want to know and understand where sin came from. I know it
entered the world through deception by the serpent, but how did it enter into
Lucifer? Where did it come from?
The wording of your question implies that
sin was some external force that entered into Lucifer. Rather, Lucifer was the
author of sin. Being the highest of angels, he pridefully
determined to set himself above God. This he did of his own free will and
volition.
6-3
Twice, recently, I have seen a reference made about God's
permissive will which is what prayer touches. I think I have an understanding
regarding His perfect will as Scripture teaches His desires toward us, and
trusting Him in all situations. I wonder if I need to know more about His
"permissive will" and the things I pray about.
God in His will functions either actively
or permissively. For example, in God's creation of the universe He operated
actively. In the freedom He gave man, He operated permissively allowing Adam to
obey or disobey. Even in man's disobedience, which God permitted, God still was
in control. In that sense, the situation was never out of His will. God remains
the sovereign Lord. God's perfect will includes both His active and His
permissive will.
6-4
I know that the unpardonable sin is blasphemy against the Holy
Spirit, which is to call the work of the Holy Spirit demonic. Are Christian
pastors and teachers committing the unpardonable sin by stating that speaking
in tongues and the manifestations of the gifts of the Spirit are all demonic?
The Apostle Paul declares that the gifts
of the Holy Spirit are "the manifestation of the Spirit" (1
Corinthians 12:7). The gifts stand out as exhibitions of the Holy Spirit in
word and deed, signifying that He is on the scene in sovereign grace and power.
Thus to declare the gifts of the Holy Spirit to be demonic is a terrible
offense against Him and His work. Such an attitude is unpardonable whether or
not it is labeled as "blasphemy against the Holy Spirit.".
6-5
Why do we hear about demons and evil spirits in the New
Testament and not so often in the Old Testament?
Since Christ's coming was in part an
attack on the demonic realm, evil was more and more exposed by Him. "The
Son of God appeared that He might destroy the works of the devil" (1 John
3:8). The New Testament records the crisis for which the Old Testament is
preparation.
6-6
Can a Christian believer be demon-possessed?
A Christian may be demon oppressed but
not possessed. A true believer has the Holy Spirit dwelling within. Although a
Christian may have many struggles against sin and evil, he or she cannot be
possessed by that evil reality. "Greater is He who is in you than he who
is in the world" (1 John 4:4).
6-7
When our body dies, where in Scripture do we find what happens
to us, spiritual or otherwise. I'm not asking about the Second Coming, I'm
asking about our physical death and what transpires after we take our last
breath prior to the return of Jesus. Do we go to heaven, hell, a holding pen,
or what?
Those who believe in Christ go
immediately to be with Him. For example, the repentant thief on the cross was
told by Jesus, "Truly I say to you, today you shall be with Me in paradise"
(Luke
(Philippians 1:23). In another place Paul
writes about being "absent from the body and at home with the Lord."
(2 Corinthians 5:6). There is no "holding pen"!
6-8
What is sin, from a theological prospective, and why is
redemption so important?
Sin is the personal act of turning away
from God and His will and the breaking of any of His commandments. This results
in bondage to sin-"Every one who commits sin is the slave of sin"
(John
6-9
"God does not hear a sinner's prayer." Could you
please clarify this? I was raised Apostolic, and my grandfather is a minister,
but there's one thing that my grandfather teaches that I do not understand.
He's ALWAYS said that "God does not hear a sinner's prayer." How can
that be true? In order for a sinner to be saved, he must first ASK (pray) for
God to come into his
life.
That IS prayer!
If
God does not hear a sinner's prayer, then wouldn't that mean NO ONE could be
saved, or forgiven for that matter? I'm a sinner, and I pray, and I feel that
God hears, sees, and knows my every thought and want. Could you please clarify
this for me?
Your position, I believe, is correct. Sin
may block a prayer from getting through, but God is always ready to listen.
6-10
Recently my youth group has been asking questions about infant
death. What do you believe happens to babies when they die? Do they go to
heaven?
I suggest you look at Matthew 18:2-4 and
6-11
I would like to know what happens to Christians who kill
themselves? Do they go to hell or are they still considered saved?
Suicide, though it is a grave sin, does
not necessarily mean the forfeiture of one's salvation. It is sometimes said
that taking one's own life is "the unpardonable sin," since there is
no opportunity for repentance after death (on the unpardonable sin see Mark
No Christian believer in his right mind
will take his own life-a life redeemed by Christ-but there may be cases in
which due to a variety of circumstances-such as stress, worry, anxiety, and the
like-when even a Christian, out of his right mind, might do this extreme thing.
Suicide is definitely wrong; however, we may believe that Christ's death can
cover such a person's death and allow him to enter heaven.
6-12
Is it OK to pray for the soul of someone who died several
years ago?
There is no suggestion in Scripture of
praying for the souls of those who have died. The decision in this life is
determinative of a person's future state of continuing lostness
or blessing. Further, the view that there is a purgatory after death, and that
prayers may be offered to help in an ongoing purification before entering
heaven, is totally foreign to Scripture.
6-13
I have a hard time understanding in the Book of Exodus where
it says that
God
hardened Pharaoh's heart. Why do you think God did this?
During the time of the plagues in
Both of these seemingly contradictory
statements are true. Pharaoh's heart was
of such a kind that when God did His mighty miracles, a hardness set in. God did
it in one sense because His act caused the hardening; in another sense Pharaoh
did it himself. Several other verses simply say that "Pharaoh's heart was
hardened" (Exodus
Perhaps you have heard the saying that
"the same sun that melts wax hardens clay." The hardening is not
caused by the sun, but is due to the nature of the substance: so with Pharaoh's
heart.
6-14
If you are a Christian and commit fornication, can God still
forgive you?
Fornicators have no place in the
Corinthians 6:9-10). Paul then adds:
"Such were some of you" (note the past tense "were").
A basic change has occurred in regard to
fornicators, and all the others mentioned: "But you were washed, but you
were sanctified, but you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ,
and in the Spirit of our God" (verse 11). Fornication, if it happens by a
Christian, is all the more heinous since such belongs to the old life of sin
and is contrary to the Christian's new nature.
Can God forgive? Yes, if one truly
repents. Paul writes about being "made sorrowful to the point of
repentance" (2 Corinthians 7:9). If a Christian commits an act of
fornication but is so deeply sorrowful as to repent and turn from it, God in
His mercy will forgive.
6-15
Where in the Bible does it talk about Satan and his fall? I
have been told that he is the prince of music and that he used to be the head
angel, but I can't seem to find this.
In Isaiah
of
declaration that "the great dragon
was thrown down, the serpent of old who is called the devil and Satan"
(12:9). These are important references relating to Satan and his fall. The
Bible does not speak of Satan as "prince of music" (however much he
does seem to dominate many forms of music today!). That Satan was "head
angel" seems to be implied in the words that follow in Revelation
12:9-"Satan and his angels."
6-16
If Jesus' blood on
First, we need to note Jesus Himself
spoke of the unpardonable sin: "All sins shall be forgiven the sons of
men, whatever blasphemies they utter; but whoever blasphemes against the Holy
Spirit never has forgiveness, but is guilty of an eternal sin" (Mark
3:28-29).
The unpardonable sin is blasphemy against
the Holy Spirit. In another Gospel, the Scripture reads: "Whoever shall
speak a word against the Son of man, it shall be forgiven him; but whosoever
shall speak against the Holy Spirit, it shall not be forgiven him, either in
this age, or in the age to come" (Matthew 12:32, cf. Luke 12:10).
The unpardonable sin is not some
extremely vile sin of gross immorality, for all such may be forgiven. Nor is it
the terrible sin of denying, even repudiating, Christ. Even this may be
forgiven. What then is the unpardonable blasphemy or speech against the Holy
Spirit?
The Scripture clearly states it in the
following words: "For they were saying He has an unclean [or 'evil, NIV]
spirit." "They" were the scribes and Pharisees who had just been
saying about Jesus, "He is possessed by Beelzebub" and "He casts
out demons by the ruler of the demons" (Mark
The unpardonable sin was to maliciously
attribute to Christ the work of the devil, to declaim as evil what is of the
Lord, to viciously label an act or work of the Holy Spirit as a demonic spirit.
Blasphemy against the Holy Spirit shows a conscience so perverse and hardened
as never to be able to receive
forgiveness. Those who commit this sin
are not the murderers, the thieves, the liars, the worldly corrupt, not even
the atheists who deny Christ, but religious leaders (like the scribes and
Pharisees) who fight against the Holy Spirit.
6-17
Is there such a place as purgatory?
According to Roman Catholic doctrine,
purgatory is a place where the souls of believers go for the further purging
away of sins before entering heaven. However, Scripture makes clear that the
souls of believers at death are immediately in the presence of God. In the book
of Hebrews there is the
picture of heaven as a place where
"the spirits of righteous men are made perfect" (
The belief in purgatory leads people
unfortunately to much anxiety and to prayers for the dead that their loved
ones' time of punishment may be shortened. It is a blessing to know that
believers at death are "made perfect" and enter into the joy of
heaven.
6-18
Why is it that Satan works so hard to break certain people? I
am in such shame, I rebuke him every moment. No matter what I do, he will not
leave me. It seems I am losing this battle, or
am I?
Rebuking Satan is important, but such
needs to be undergirded by calling on the name of
Jesus for deliverance. Satan cannot withstand a living faith in Christ.
6-19
If God created the devil and the devil is the prince of the
world, does that mean that God is the cause of all evil, since the devil is the
one who hurts us and he was originally a creation of God?
God did not create the devil! He did
create the angels, one of whom-possible the highest-became the devil through
his own willful action against God. The fact that the devil is instrumental in
all evil thereafter does not mean that God is the cause of such since the devil
was not originally God's
creation.
6-20
Since God created all that is in our temporal universe
(including abstract realities such as love and kindness), is it fair to say He
also created evil? I realize, theologically, that Satan is the father of evil
and that Adam and Eve opened the door with their disobedience. But can evil
exist without first being created?
God did not create evil. According to
Genesis 1, everything God created, or made, was declared "good"
(verses 4, 10, 12, 18, 21, 25), indeed altogether "very good" (verse
31). Among the highest good there is the gift of freedom: "Man is that
entity made to be free" Genuine freedom includes freedom of decision for
or against God (man was not made a robot!). It was man's decision against God
and His command that brought evil upon the earth. (Satan was also involved but
not the cause of this evil; man was fully responsible.) Evil is disharmony that
man willfully brought into the world.
6-21
How is God's permissive will related to the occurrence of sin
and the Fall?
Sin could not have occurred without God's
permissive will. It was a matter both of God's permission and of His will. God
permitted it to happen, yet also through its occurrence He purposed to make it
an instrument to manifest His grace and glory. There is undoubtedly a strange
paradox here. God surely did not will the sin of man, else He would have been
the author of evil; yet He did will that through sin and the fall His purpose
should be fulfilled.
One aspect of this surely will be the
demonstration of His grace, for only through sin will the glory of God's grace
become utterly manifest. Without the sin of the human race, there would have
been no
This by no means mitigates the
heinousness of sin and evil nor the ensuing misery of the human condition. But
it does say that through it all God is sovereignly
working out His purpose to manifest the heights of His grace and glory.
6-22
What does the doctrine of "original sin" affirm?
"Original sin" refers to the
fact that the human race is sinful in nature. This by no means refers to human nature
as God made it-or makes it-but to the fact that before man commits any sin he
is already a sinner. This situation may be described in terms both of sin being
passed on to all people from the first man and our identification with primal
man in his sin.
However depicted, the important feature
is that man does not come into the world as an innocent or neutral creature but
is affected by sin in all aspects of his being (Psalm 58:3; cf. Psalm 51:5).
Indeed, by virtue of this fact, man is vitiated in every area of his
nature-body, soul, spirit-so that he is utterly incapable himself of
restoration and salvation. His only hope is in Jesus Christ.
7. Christ - Incarnation, Atonement, Resurrection
7-1
Our minister said you can be a Christian without believing in the
Virgin Birth. That's a new one on me. He thinks you only have to believe in the
death and resurrection of Christ.
It is true that you only have to believe
in the death and resurrection of Christ for salvation. There is no reference in
the New Testament to anyone proclaiming the Virgin Birth or belief in it as a
requirement for being a Christian. However, this is not to deny the importance
of the doctrine of the Virgin Birth which is well attested in the Bible and set
forth as background for the Incarnation--Christ's life, death, and
resurrection.
7-2
Do you believe that Jesus was holy at His birth? I do, and
some say no.
I agree with you that Jesus was holy at
His birth. He was God in human flesh and as such holy as God is holy. Jesus
also showed forth perfect holiness at every stage of His life's journey.
7-3
Why did Jesus pray to God? If Jesus is God, wouldn't that be
just like
praying
to yourself? Wouldn't praying to yourself be a futile exercise?
Jesus was also a man. As such, He offered
prayers to God. In the mystery of the Incarnation, He was both one with God the
Father as well as a distinct person. So Jesus' praying was not a futile
exercise.
7-4
What powers did Jesus have?
Jesus being both God and man had the
power of God Almighty and of man at his peak. He functioned, therefore, with
multiple powers belonging to both deity and humanity.
7-5
In Mathew 27:46, why did Jesus say "My God, My God, why
hast thou forsaken
me?"
And what exactly did He mean?
Jesus cried out these words because at that
moment He was making atonement for the sins of all mankind. He was experiencing
terrible God-forsakenness as He endured our agony and punishment.
7-6
Why is the resurrection an essential part of the gospel
message?
If Christ is not risen, our faith would
be literally a dead faith. By Christ's death, He conquered sin. By His
resurrection, He conquered death. Thus we can say with Paul about the
resurrection, "O Death, where is your victory? O Death, where is your
sting?….But thanks be to God, who gives us
the victory through our Lord Jesus
Christ" (1 Corinthians
7-7
I get puzzled when I hear that Jesus Christ had brothers. My
understanding is that the Virgin Mary had no other children after Jesus' birth.
Were Jesus' cousins referred to as His brothers? This is confusing for a lot of
people. Please explain.
Listen to the following verses of
Scripture: "While He was still speaking to the multitudes, behold, His
mother and His brothers were standing outside, seeking to speak to Him"
(Matthew
"After this He went down to
The most natural interpretation of these
passages---and other similar ones ---is that those referred to were half
brothers and half sisters of Jesus, born of Mary and Joseph subsequent to the
birth of Christ. There is no suggestion of their being cousins of Jesus.
7-8
Since angels are created beings, as we are, and also have free
will, and the capacity to fall, is there any indication that Christ's atonement
for sin also covers them?
There is no indication in Scripture that
Christ's atonement also covers the sins of angels. Christ took on Himself human
nature not angelic nature. There may be some other plan for angels, but the
Bible does not reveal it.
7-9
Which is the most important: The death of God's Son for our
Redemption, or the proclamation of the death of God's Son for our Redemption?
In order of priority, the death of God's
Son for our Redemption is primary. Otherwise, there is nothing to proclaim. The
gospel proclamation is based on fact not myth.
Yes. As God, He shares the Godhead with
God the Father and God the Holy Spirit. Thus He is not a separate deity. He is
also totally man. Except for sin, He fully shares our humanity. This is the
great mystery of the Incarnation.
7-11
Speaking of the pre-incarnate Christ, Philippians 2:7 says
that He "emptied Himself." What exactly did He empty Himself of?
Paul's words in Philippians 2:7 are to be
understood as Christ's surrender of His glory and riches in the taking on the
form of a servant or slave. The self-emptying was a profound expression of the
love and compassion that is the central reality of God's nature.
7-12
John wrote in Revelation
John fell at the feet of Jesus not out of
fear but due to the vision of Jesus in His majestic glory. John had known Jesus
in the flesh but this was a revelation of His divine being.
7-13
I've been reading the four gospels, and I want to ask why
Jesus is called the Son of man. What is its relationship with Him being the Son
of God?
Jesus was one person with two natures. He
called Himself the Son of man in that He identified Himself with all humanity. He
was a human being in the fullest sense but also the Son of God. As the Son of
God, He was likewise through and through divine. As such a dual person, He was
the Redeemer of the world.
7-14
Are we to believe that Judas Iscariot was predestined to betray
Jesus or could he have refused to do so? Was this individual a part of God's
ultimate plan for the death and resurrection of Jesus?
The following words of Jesus are
particularly relevant: "For indeed, the Son of Man is going as it has been
determined, but woe to that man through whom He is betrayed!" (Luke
22:22). This verse contains both the fact of predestination as well as Judas's
personal responsibility. In that sense, he
was a part of God's ultimate plan but at
the same time freely active in the betrayal of Jesus. Thus Judas was fully
guilty.
7-15
Do you believe that after one is saved, generational curses
follow? The doctrine of generational curses is being greatly pressed at our
church. Do you believe that it's biblical that even after one is saved and in
Christ that generational curses follow us? Isn't it more true that Christ
became a curse for us and automatically cut them off? And that instead, only
our sin nature follows us which Christ is in the process of purifying and
sanctifying and bringing us deliverance from? I would really appreciate your
comments on this.
The concept of generational curses is too
heavy a burden for the body of Christ to bear. Your question is actually a good
counteractive which recognizes that in Christ we are set free from any and all
curses of the past. To be sure, we do inherit a sinful nature from Adam and his
descendants; however, all generational curses are removed from believers by the
blood of Christ. Therefore there is no need for spending time in searching out what
curses apply to us today. I repeat, it is an unnecessary burden from which we
have been freed in Christ.
7-16
Why didn't God make another way to redeem man instead of
requiring the death of His Son?
To answer your question, I recommend that
instead of questioning God's way of redemption that you first of all rejoice in
it. Now to move on: the way God chose
was the way of vast love in which Christ, the Son of God and the Son of man,
died for all people. The sin of man was so grave that only God
Himself could redeem man from it, and
only one who was also man could suffer and die in our place. On the matter of
requiring the death of His son, God's great love and Christ's willing consent
made it all possible. "God so loved the world that He gave His only
begotten Son…."
7-17
Who is Jesus and who is the Christ?
Jesus is both God and man. As God, He
came to earth and took upon Himself human flesh. He was truly God and truly man
in the same person. This is the mystery of the Incarnation. The word
"Christ" literally means "anointed." Jesus was the Anointed
One to fulfill God's mission to save mankind. To
believe in Jesus Christ is the way of
salvation.
7-18
We know Jesus died and rose; what is the theological impact of
these events on the Christian life?
In Jesus' death He bore all the
punishment due us for our sins and in His resurrection made immortality
possible-"He abolished death and brought life and immortality to
light" (2 Tim. 1:10). Jesus is Victor over all!
7-19
Is there such a thing as the "Immaculate
Conception"? What does it mean, to whom does it apply, and are there
biblical references to support or disprove the "Immaculate
Conception"?
The "Immaculate Conception" is
a dogma of the Roman Catholic Church that claims that Mary herself was conceived
without sin (hence, immaculately) and so was sinless when she bore Jesus. This
dogma has no basis in Scripture and must not be confused with the doctrine of
the Virgin Birth which is solidly taught in Scripture.
7-20
My sister recently converted to Islam due to her son's
influence. She claims Islam is the only religion. What information can I give
her or tell her about this decision she has made?
If Christ's claim is valid, "I am
the way, and the truth, and the life" (John 14:6), Christianity is the
only true religion. Islam is a religion, but by not focusing on Christ misses
the truth.
7-21
Can you tell me what happened to Jesus during those three days
He was dead before He rose to heaven? Where was He? Did He go to hell before
going to heaven?
During those three days Jesus was alive
in the spirit and dead in the body. In regard to the spirit, immediately
following His cry from the cross, "It is finished," the Scripture
adds, "He bowed His head and gave up His spirit" (John
commit My spirit" (Luke
Thus Christ did not go to hell before
going to heaven: His spirit went into heaven, the Father's presence ("it
was not abandoned to Hades") and His body placed in the grave. It is a
mistake to assume (as some do) that Christ went to hell where, after three days
of struggle with Satan, Christ finally defeated him. No, when Christ said,
"It is finished," victory was already won! Our redemption was
accomplished by His death on the cross. There is one passage that speaks of an
activity of Christ in the spirit: "He was put to death in the flesh, but
made alive in the spirit, in which also
He went and made proclamation to the
spirits in prison who once were disobedient, when the patience of God kept
waiting in the days of Noah" (1 Peter
accomplished!
7-22
What is your opinion of the visions of Mary (mother of Jesus)
that so many people are having? Do you think it is Mary, or, as I believe, a
familiar spirit to deceive and take the prayer emphasis off Christ?
Visions of Mary are delusive, yes,
because they do take the focus off Christ. For example, in Medjugorge
(Yugoslavia), where for a number of years presumed appearances by the Virgin
Mary have occurred, such words as these have been spoken: "Dear children,
abandon yourself to me that I may lead you totally," "I will be
forever close to you," "I want to bring you to heaven to God."
These, and many others, are words that only Christ has the right to speak.
Christ, to be sure, is also recognized. For example, "Without love, you
cannot accept me or my son." The Mary of the New Testament would never speak
such words as these.
7-23
In the third chapter of Luke, verse 23, it speaks of Jesus as
the (supposed) son of Joseph. I don't understand this verse because Jesus was
not the son of Joseph. So my question is, how do you explain this verse and the
genealogy that follows to verse 38?
You are correct in saying that Jesus was
not the actual son of Joseph. However, people at large supposed he was since
they had no knowledge of the Virgin Birth. Joseph nonetheless was Jesus' legal
father, and Mary was betrothed to him (see Matthew 1:18-"Mary was
betrothed to Joseph…before they came together she was found to be with child by
the Holy Spirit").
Betrothal at that time constituted a
legitimate marriage even though the sexual union had not been consummated. Hence
although Jesus was not, as people supposed, the physical or natural son of
Joseph, he was the legal son. Thus the genealogy that follows to verse 38
legitimately traces Joseph's line all the way back to Adam.
7-24
When Jesus died on the cross, did He die for all possible
wrongdoings committed by humans at present and in the future? Could He
anticipate my sins and others 2000 years ahead?
Christ in His divinity could surely
anticipate all sins and so in dying on the cross bear the full weight of every
possible wrongdoing. Paul's declaration that Christ was made "sin on our
behalf" (2 Corinthians
7-25
In a Q & A related to the Apostles Creed, you wrote that
the statement "He descended into hell" "vividly expresses the
full extent of Christ's vicarious sacrifice, even suffering the torment of hell
for all people." At what point did Christ suffer the torment?
Christ endured the torment of hell in His
suffering and death on the cross. The agonizing cry of "My God, My God,
why hast Thou forsaken Me?" (Matthew 27:46; Mark
suffering. The veil of the temple
"torn in two from top to bottom" (Matthew 27:51; Mark
7-26
I know that Jesus is God's Son, and that He was sent to the
earth to die on the cross for our sins. I just don't understand why He had to
die for us? Was it to satisfy God's anger against man? Why His Son, though?
Christ did not have to die for us, but He
did so willingly for our salvation. As the Son of man, Christ took upon Himself
our flesh and bore the full weight of God's wrath against sin and evil. Thereby
He was our substitute, dying in our place. As the Son of God, hence fully
divine, He was able to reach out and accomplish the mighty work of redemption.
Why His Son? The answer is that only God could have paid the full price, the
Father in heaven through His Son on earth. This is the marvel and mystery of
the Incarnation.
7-27
What is the mystery of the Incarnation?
"The Word became flesh" (John
This event is a fact of such proportions
as to transcend human imagination: the God of the universe, the Creator of all
things invisible and visible--angelic hosts as well as countless galaxies and
stars--has in Jesus Christ come to this minute planet called Earth and taken
upon Himself our human existence. If the original creation of the universe out
of nothing is an immeasurable vast and
incomprehensible act of Almighty God, the
Incarnation is surely no less stupendous. Superlatives will not suffice.
Perhaps best are the words of Paul:
"Great indeed, we confess, is the mystery of our religion: He was
manifested in the flesh" (1 Timothy 3:16). Great indeed! And the purpose
of the Incarnation (again one is carried beyond adequate words to declare it)
is the redemption of the human race. Jesus was born to die and in dying to bear
the awful weight and punishment of sins of all
mankind.
He came as a Mediator of the covenant of
grace, the "one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus, who
gave himself as a ransom for all" (1 Timothy 2:5). In the words of the
Fourth Gospel, the Word who became flesh was "full of grace and
truth" (John 1:14) and "from his fullness have we all received, grace
upon grace" (1:16). Verily, it is the unfathomable
grace of God bringing eternal salvation.
7-28
What does the "Son of man" mean?
The phrase "the Son of man"
means basically "the man" or "man." All men are sons of
men, that is, mankind. Even so Jesus "the Son of man" is a man, a
human, a member of the human race. "Son of man" and "man"
basically are equivalent terms. The expression "the Son of man"
occurs frequently in the four Gospels as a reference of Jesus to Himself.
Eighty-two times the phrase occurs and on
more than forty occasions.
It is used invariably as Jesus' own
self-designation. No one else ever addresses Him by that title. It is as open a
statement about Jesus' identity as "the Son of God" is a hidden one
made known supernaturally by revelation. By Jesus' use of the title "the
Son of man," He identified Himself with our
humanity. Also, as "the Son of
man,"
He was man in perfection and could be a
substitute for sinful man on the cross. Further, by calling Himself "the
Son of man," Jesus demonstrated His deep humility (see for example,
Matthew 20:21-"The Son of man did not come to be served, but to
serve"). Jesus did also on a few occasions call Himself "the Son of
God" (John 5:25; 10:36; 11:4).
7-29
What is the significance of Christ's resurrection for us?
First, His resurrection brought the
climax of our salvation. If Christ had not been raised from the dead, our
salvation would not have been consummated. As Paul says, "If Christ has
not been raised, your faith is futile and you are still in your sins" (1
Corinthians 15:17). For despite God's act of reconciliation in Christ, if
Christ had remained locked in the grave, there would have been no life and no
salvation.
John Calvin writes, "How could He
have obtained the victory for us, if He had fallen in the contest?" Paul
says elsewhere that Christ was "put to death for our trespasses and raised
for our justification" (Romans 4:25). Justification, the free gift of
righteousness, is the very heart of salvation and is made possible through the
death of Christ. But unless Christ had been raised, justification would literally
have been a dead matter.
Hence through the resurrection of Christ
our salvation has been completed. Second, let us observe more closely that the
problem of mankind is not only sin but also death. So salvation means victory
over both sin and death. Thus did Christ in His great saving act deal
decisively not only with sin at the cross but also with death through His
resurrection. For truly He has also
broken the power of death.
In the words of Paul, our "Savior Jesus
Christ…has broken the power of death and brought life and immortality to
light" (2 Timothy 1:10). However, we need to add immediately, death does
not inherently have power but derives its power from Satan who brought it into
human existence. And the marvel of what Christ has done is that He partook of
our nature that "through death He might break the power of him who has
death at his command, that is, the devil; and might liberate those who, through
fear of death, had all their lifetime been in servitude" (Hebrews
2:14-15).
Thus Satan's power over death has been
broken. Not only did Christ rise victorious over Satan and death, but He also
has wrought this victory for all who belong to Him. We may now state it more
specifically: By rising from the dead, Christ has won the victory over both sin
and death. Thereby our justification is complete, and life has been raised up.
Beyond forgiveness and reconciliation is a new life in Jesus Christ to be with
Him alive for evermore! For in Christ's resurrection we are raised to eternal
life with Him.
7-30
How can we be sure of our future resurrection?
Christ's resurrection from the dead
assures our resurrection in the age to come. For not only are we raised from
the dead spiritually now through faith in Christ, but we will also be raised
bodily in the coming age.
Paul writes that "if for this life
only we have hoped in Christ, we are of all men most
to be pitied." Then he adds,
"But in fact Christ has been raised from the dead, the first fruits of
those who have fallen asleep. For as by a man came death, by a man has come
also the resurrection of the dead" (1 Corinthians 15:19-21). Since the
raising of Christ is the "first fruits," other fruit is
sure to follow, namely, our resurrection
from the dead. Thus Christ has brought life and immortality to light.
This means that some day--"at the
last trumpet"--"the dead will be raised imperishable….For this
perishable must put on the imperishable and this mortal must put on
immortality" (1 Corinthians 15:52-53). This is not some natural
immortality but an immortality to be "put on"--and it all comes
through Jesus Christ. Paul climactically
cries forth, "'Death is swallowed up in victory'…thanks be to God who
gives us the victory through our Lord Jesus Christ" (1 Corinthians 15:54,
56).
Because of Christ's resurrection from the
dead we thus have assurance of our resurrection to come.
With Paul and the saints of all ages, we
may rejoice in what God has done through Jesus Christ. Another declaration of
Paul provides a fitting summary word of the Christian testimony:
"If we live, we live to the Lord,
and if we die, we die to the Lord; so then, whether we live or whether we die,
we are the Lord's. For to this end Christ died and lived again, that He might
be Lord both of the dead and of the living" (Romans 14:8-9).
7-31
Could you speak about the Atonement and God's forgiveness?
One way of summarizing the whole matter
of the Atonement is to view it in terms of divine forgiveness. Here we begin by
recalling the words of Jesus: "This is my blood of the new covenant, which
is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins" (Matthew 26:28). The
pouring out, or shedding, of Jesus' blood was for forgiveness of sins. We may,
accordingly, speak of the
death of Jesus--the shedding of His
blood--as the cost of God's forgiveness.
Let us observe several things. First, it
is important to recognize that only the one sinned against is in a position to
forgive. Christ was supremely sinned against because in His suffering and dying
on the cross He endured the attack of evil, not only of those who directly put
Him to death but of sinful man of every race and age.
As God in human flesh He could and did
receive this total attack. If there was to be forgiveness, it could come only
from Him. But it would be at a terrifying cost. Second, Christ in His great
love received the assault of mankind's sin and evil without fighting back. In
the fulfilled words of Isaiah 53: "He was oppressed, and he was afflicted,
yet he opened not his mouth" (verse 7). He accepted the gibes and mockery
of those around the cross, He suffered the pain and anguish of the crown of
thorns and the spikes of nails, He did not call down legions of angels from
heaven to scatter and destroy the vicious foe.
He simply took it all--all the evil of
mankind reinforced by the powers of darkness. The agony of Christ dying on the
cross therefore is beyond all comprehension; His affliction without retaliation
transcends all that mankind has ever known. Third, not only did Christ receive
all of evil's bitter onslaught, but He also reached out in compassion to bear
evil's shame, guilt and condemnation.
Although He was wounded by the
transgressions of the world, His even greater anguish was that of sensing the
utter loss, misery, even damnation of those attacking Him, and (marvel beyond
marvels) in infinite compassion receiving that misery and condemnation as if it
were His own.
"He was pierced for our
transgressions; he was crushed for our iniquities; the punishment that brought
us peace was upon him…" (Isaiah 53:5 NIV). As a result, in His great love
and mercy He took away the sin, the guilt, the punishment of the world and gave
us His peace and salvation.
8. Salvation - Calling, Regeneration, Justification
8-1
In John 3:16, Jesus says that "He that believeth on Me
hath everlasting life," yet in Matthew 7:21 He says that "not
everyone who says 'Lord, Lord,' shall enter into the kingdom of heaven."
Could you please help me see how this is not contradictory?
There is no contradiction here. Believing
in Christ is the way of salvation. Calling on His name, even to saying
"Lord, Lord," is not enough. Rather, in this latter case, the person
who does the will of the Father shall enter the kingdom of heaven. Believing in
Christ includes commitment to the Father's
will, a saying of 'Lord, Lord' from the
heart.
8-2
Can one who has committed adultery still be saved? I have
prayed for forgiveness but still feel lost. Can I be helped?
We read in the Bible: "Let marriage be
held in honor among all, and let the marriage bed be undefiled; for fornicators
and adulterers God will judge" (Hebrews 13:4). Thus your situation of
adultery is a very serious matter. However, God delights to forgive the truly
penitent soul: "If we confess our sins, He is faithful and righteous to
forgive our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness" (1 John 1:9).
8-3
As we've all heard the old saying, "A leopard can't
change his spots." Is this true with man? I want so badly to change the
person that I am, I want to be a better spouse, a better parent. I have sinned
in all aspects of my life. All I want to do is become a different person, and
stop doing the same things that I struggle with daily. Is this possible? Can
God literally change a person? Is there really such a thing as "a new
lease on life?"
Hear the New Testament: "If any man
be in Christ, he is a new creature: old things are passed away; behold, all
things are become new" (2 Corinthians 5:17). The leopard may not be able
to change his spots, but Christ in you can change your whole life into a new
one. It is not so much that you should
want to be a better person as rather to
become a new person wherein all aspects of your life can be changed. Not better
but new!
8-4
I myself am a Christian, but I have an interesting question. The
Bible says all who know Jesus Christ as their Savior will go to heaven. But
what about Jews?
Paul writes about the status of the Jews
in Romans 9 through 11. He says at one point, "My heart's desire and my prayer
to God for them is for their salvation" (10:1). Jews have a special place
in God's plan. This does not mean they are automatically saved. Jew and Gentile
alike need faith in Christ for salvation to occur.
8-5 My friends, who call themselves Christians,
believe that certain Muslims, Mormons, Jews, etc. will go to heaven. Their
reasoning, if you can call it that, is God is so infinite how do we know He
doesn't reach other people through these religions…sort of a many roads to
salvation theory. What scripturally can I tell them
to refute this theory?
By way of refutation, see, for example,
the following Scriptures: John 14:6, Jesus said, "I am the way, and the
truth, and the life; no one comes to the Father, but through Me" (note,
the way not one of several ways); Acts 4:12, Simon Peter declared about Jesus,
"And there is salvation in no one else;
for there is no other name under heaven
that has been given among men, by which we must be saved"; Romans 10:9,
Paul writes, "If you confess with your mouth Jesus as Lord, and believe in
your heart that God raised Him from the dead, you shall be saved." Such
verses as these, and many more could be cited, contradict the "many roads
to salvation" theory.
8-6
Do you believe that Christians from different churches…like
Seventh-Day, Baptist, Pentecostal...will all be saved?
Surely, Christians from many different
churches will be saved. It is a personal matter. Romans 10:9 declares: "If
you confess with your mouth Jesus as Lord, and believe in your heart that God
raised Him from the dead, you shall be saved." It is not a question of
which church you belong to but
whether you have genuinely made a
personal statement of faith in Christ. It is important that the church you
attend be a believers' church, one that steadfastly proclaims the way of
salvation.
8-7
I believe that you are saved by faith but I get hung up on
"works." I am a born again Christian and everything and believe that
you are saved by faith and Jesus' death on the cross. But sometimes I get
really hung up on the works stuff. Like a lot of times in the Bible in the New
Testament it seems to be saying that you get to Heaven by doing good works.
Faith always has the primacy over works
in terms of salvation. We are saved not by works; but also we are not saved
without them. A lively faith will always demonstrate itself through good works.
"For just as the body without the spirit is dead, so also faith without
works is dead" (James 2:26). In
Paul's words, it is a matter of
"faith working through love" (Galatians 5:6).
8-8
What is the difference between Regeneration, Justification,
and Sanctification?
All three are ways of talking about
salvation. Regeneration means to be born again. Justification means to be declared
righteous by what Christ has done by His death on the cross. Sanctification
refers to the new life of holiness that has begun.
8-9
I believe in Jesus and want to "share" the good news
with others but the question that others keep asking me is why do I say that
Jesus is the only way to the Father and what gives me the right to impose my
beliefs on others? I can show scripture references to why Jesus is the only way
to the Father with no success but my main question is what gives me the right
to as they say "impose" my belief on them? Not wanting to impose
anything but to share.
A proper presentation of the gospel must
be done without imposition. We truly have good news to share. The joy of your
faith should be so present as to be almost contagious. After all, there is
nothing else that comes close to the blessing of salvation that you have
received. So let the non-coercive
joy of the good news be present in all
your witness.
Regeneration means essentially rebirth:
it is re-generation. Hence regeneration is a being born again or anew. The
classic New Testament passage is these words of Jesus: "You must be born
again" (John 3:7). We may also note Peter's words to Christians: "you
have been born again" (1 Peter
1:23). Paul declares to Titus that God
"saved us…by the washing of regeneration and renewing by the Holy
Spirit" (Titus 3:5).
These three passages stand out in their
testimony to regeneration; and the last (in Titus) specifically relates this to
salvation. It is apparent that this is a spiritual rebirth. It is not a second
physical birth, but a rebirth that is spiritual. Jesus emphasized this in His
words just prior to those about rebirth: "That which is born of the flesh
is flesh, and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit" (John 3:6).
Thus, through the Holy Spirit there is spiritual rebirth. The Old Testament
looked forward to this.
God spoke through Ezekiel concerning
Israel: "I will give them one heart, and put a new spirit within
them" (Ezekiel 11:19; see also 36:26). Jeremiah says: "I will give
them a heart to know that I am the Lord" (Jeremiah 24:7). And the psalmist
prays, "Create in me a clean heart, O God, and put a new and right spirit
within me" (Psalm 51:10). Although the language of the Old Testament is
not precisely that of rebirth, it points in the direction of a spiritual
renovation for which the word "regeneration" is the fulfillment.
Regeneration, however, cannot be limited
to one area of human nature. It is not only that the spirit, or heart, is made
new, but the person himself is thereby a new being. As noted, Paul writes that
God "saved us"--not just our spirits--as persons: we have been born
again. Paul writes similarly elsewhere, "If any one is in Christ, he is a
new creation; the old has passed away, behold, the new has come" (2
Corinthians 5:17). The person is a new creature. This is the wonder of
regeneration.
8-11
How can I have eternal life?
The answer to your question may be found
in John 3:16: "For God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten
Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish, but have eternal
life." Believing in Christ is the key: accepting Him, trusting Him,
committing yourself totally to Him. This
includes also repentance for past sins in
the strength that Christ provides. I suggest that you talk about all this with
some pastor or spiritual leader and, in that person's presence, you declare
your faith in Christ as your Savior and Lord.
8-12
Is sanctification of yourself through your own efforts with
support from Jesus essential for salvation?
By your question, I am afraid that you
have made salvation basically a matter of your own achievement. However,
salvation is more than support from Jesus, thankfully. Salvation is a matter of
grace not works, relying totally on Jesus as Savior and Lord. Sanctification
also is more than your own efforts with support from Jesus. It is likewise not
a matter of your own achievement but of Christ working in you.
8-13
Are people baptized by the blood of Christ at conversion or is
it a separate experience? If the Trinity is in Christ, should I pray for Holy
Spirit baptism? Should I try to divide the Godhead by exalting the Comforter?
People are saved by the blood of Christ at
conversion. The Trinity is not in Christ, but Christ is in the Trinity. So is
the Holy Spirit. Yes, you may surely pray for Holy Spirit baptism without
dividing the Godhead or exalting the Comforter.
8-14
Are the Ten Commandments still binding on us who are saved by
faith in Christ Jesus? Paul in Romans 3:31 seems to indicate that they are when
he says, "Do we then nullify the Law through faith? May it never be! On
the contrary, we establish the Law."
Paul is speaking here against antinomianism,
namely, the view that because of our salvation through faith the law is void,
or nullified. His reaction is very strong against such a viewpoint ("May
it never be!"). The fact that we are not "under law, but under grace"
(Romans 6:14) does not mean the
voiding of the law. The law, especially
as embodied in the Ten Commandments and in our moral consciousness (see Romans
2:15), is God's law for all people. However, until salvation came, the law
could not be truly fulfilled. Now there is the inner motivation and ability to
accomplish such. Grace
amazingly establishes the law!
8-15
Please explain the doctrine of unconditional election. Can the
unelected still be saved?
The doctrine of unconditional election as
affirmed particularly by Calvinistic churches declares that salvation is wholly
God's doing. He elects those whom He wills unconditionally, and man has nothing
to contribute to it. This, I believe, is an extreme view of the sovereignty of
God that leaves nothing to the human decision. On the contrary, God's election
stands in close correlation with faith. The elect are those who believe. God
surely has the priority, but there must be the response of faith. We are
elected by God as believers. Without faith there is no election. Unconditional election
too much omits the human side.
8-16
If the Bible states that we can only come to Jesus if we are
drawn by the Spirit, then do we actually have free will? In other words, the
Bible states that He chooses us. Did we not choose Him? So where is the free
will?
According to Matthew 22:14, Jesus says,
"Many are called but few are chosen." Hence, though His calling is
primary, not all are chosen. In Jesus' own ministry He called many to follow
Him but not all did. See for example Luke 9:59 where Jesus says to a man,
"Follow Me," but the response was
negative with the excuse, "Permit me
first to go and bury my father." The man was called but not chosen by
virtue of his own free decision. Hence the choosing by God always includes the
willing response of faith.
8-17
My question pertains to faith and works and how the two
concepts should be applied in our daily living. Romans 3:28, Galatians 2:16,
and Ephesians 2:8 state that by grace we are saved through faith but not by
works. How does this agree with James 2:14-26?
According to James 2:21, "Abraham
our Father was justified by works." Does this contradict other words such
as those of Paul in Romans 4:2, "If Abraham was justified by works, he has
something to boast about; but not before God"? There is no contradiction
here. Further on James adds, "Faith without works is dead" (verse
26). This means that, although we are justified by faith alone, true faith is
never alone. Paul speaks elsewhere of "faith working through love"
(Galatians 5:6). A living faith will always overflow in good deeds.
8-18
As Christians we are saved through Christ. What about the
Jews? Will they be judged differently from others?
Jews and Gentiles alike are saved through
Christ. There is no difference for, in Paul's words, "Both Jews and
Gentiles are all under sin" (Romans 3:9) and "God will justify the
circumcised by faith and the uncircumcised through faith" (verse 30). The
same faith in Christ is necessary for both
Gentiles and Jews to be saved.
8-19
If we are chosen to be saved or not, then does prayer help for
a non-Christian's salvation? I was told that if I pray for my daughter's
salvation but the Lord has not chosen her, it would do no good. Please advise.
It is a serious error to say that
"we are chosen to be saved or not" as if God arbitrarily excludes a
person from coming to Christ. In one of His parables Jesus declared, "Many
are called, but few are chosen" (Matthew 22:14). "Many" refers
to all to whom the gospel is preached-it is the universal call for salvation.
The chosen ones are those who respond
affirmatively to the call and thus are saved. God chooses those who respond in
faith; if anyone is bypassed, it is not God's doing, but is due to the
negative response to His call. Praying
for your daughter's salvation is much in order! Such may help her come to a
living faith and be among God's chosen ones.
8-20
Do we have to do away with the law if we are saved by grace?
Not at all. The law, referring
particularly to the moral law (to which our consciences and the Ten Commandments
bear witness) is from God and is binding upon all people. Yet, because of the
sin of the human race, the law cannot be kept; indeed, as Paul puts it, the law
has become a curse ("the
curse of the law," Galatians 3:13).
Now, however, when we are saved by grace
(not by law!), the law for the first time can be maintained. As Augustine said
long ago, "Grace was given that the law might be fulfilled." The law
is by no means done away by grace; instead, by the indwelling Spirit the law
may at last be kept (even if there is
still continuing sin). Rather than the law being a curse, we can now joyfully
say, with the Psalmist, "O how I love Thy law!" (119:97).
8-21
Do we need to go to a priest to really be forgiven and saved?
In the Bible, the risen Jesus said to His
disciples, "If you forgive the sins of any, their sins have been
forgiven" (John 20:23). Catholics believe that this means you must go to
the priest to get forgiveness for your sins, (as well as asking Jesus
yourself).
Does this mean that we need to go to a
priest to really be forgiven and saved? I know that I'm saved, but this still
bothers me. John 20:23 does not mean that we must go to a priest to get
forgiveness for sins. Jesus is speaking to His disciples in general (see verses
19 and 20-"disciples" twice used). As Christians, we may pray for
others, forgive and receive forgiveness, and also individually pray directly to
the Lord for our own forgiveness.
According to 1 John 1:9, "If we
confess our sins, He is faithful and righteous to forgive us our sins and to
cleanse us from all unrighteousness." Christ is "the high priest of
our confession" (Hebrews
3:1). We need not go to any other!
8-22
Can a person who is born again but has unforgiveness
in his or her heart towards another believer still go to heaven?
Jesus Himself placed a very high premium
on forgiving sins in the Lord's Prayer. He taught His disciples to pray,
"Forgive us our trespasses as we also forgive those who trespass against
us" (Matthew 6:12). Note the word "as." "As" signifies
"in proportion to." At the conclusion of the Lord's
Prayer, Jesus stressed again the need to
practice forgiveness: "For if you forgive men when they sin against you,
your heavenly Father will also forgive you.
But if you do not forgive men their sins,
your Father will not forgive your sins" (Matthew 6:14-15). Also, in Jesus'
ministry He emphasized that there is no limit to the number of times one should
forgive, "seventy times seven" (Matthew 18:22). Finally, Jesus
demonstrated the ultimate forgiveness from the cross when He cried out,
"Father, forgive them for they know not what they do" (Luke 23:34).
So unforgiveness is a very serious matter and should
be dealt with by every sincere believer.
8-23
What about the God-fearers who lived before the time of Jesus?
If Jesus is truly the ONLY way and we need His sacrifice in order to be saved,
what about those who lived before the crucifixion? Are we to assume that none
of them were saved or made it to heaven? Or, are we to infer that it was possible
to make it to heaven without the work of Christ?
We must always bear in mind that Christ's
sacrifice was sufficient to cover the entire human race past, present, and
future. What happened at Calvary was, of course, the objective event that makes
salvation possible for all people. We do need His sacrifice in order to be
saved. Verses like Genesis
3:15 point from the beginning to the
future hope and promise of One who would someday "crush the serpent's
head" (NIV). Believing in God's promise was basically the way of salvation
in the Old Testament. The Old Testament worthies did not make it to heaven
without the work of Christ in redemption.
8-24
Do children who die before the age of accountability go to
heaven or not? I'm writing to further your discussion of a question on CBN.com
about infant baptism and salvation. I agree with your perspective that baptism
alone does not save. However, I would like to get your thoughts on this
follow-up question: Do children who die before the age of accountability go to
heaven
or
not?
On the matter of children that die before
the age of accountability, there is little Scripture to go on. The closest
approximation would be the words of Jesus in Luke 18:16, "Let the little children
come to Me, and do not hinder them, for the kingdom of heaven belongs to such
as these" (NIV), and Christ embraced them all. This does not mean that
little children are innocent, but by a special act of God's grace they are
taken into His presence.
9.
Sanctification, Perseverance
9-1
For the last two years, I have had nothing but heartache and
trial – God placing me in the impossible and carrying me through. At times, I
feel I have reached the end of the lesson and now I can do anything, but then I
slide here and there back into temptation and my wants. After sanctification do
we still struggle to behave as God wants ... or is it foreign for us to
sin?
Sin is basically foreign to the believer
since the Holy Spirit dwells within. However, the flesh is still there often
warring to a high degree against the Spirit. This should make us rely more on
God to give us the victory.
9-2
Is sanctification an immediate experience when somebody
becomes a Christian?
Can
a born again Christian live a sanctified life here on earth?
First of all, sanctification is
experienced in the new birth. Paul writes about the born again experience,
"You were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of
the Lord Jesus Christ and in the Spirit of our God" (1 Corinthians
6:9-11). Thus immediate sanctification is part of the
experience. We are holy, therefore, by
virtue of the Holy Spirit who sanctifies us and dwells within.
Still there remains sin in every life
which calls for further sanctification. Thus sanctification is also a process
day by day. Concerning this matter, Paul writes, "Beloved, let us cleanse
ourselves from every defilement of body and spirit, and make holiness perfect
in the fear of God" (1 Corinthians 7:1).
9-3
Can you ever lose your salvation? Because I have done so much
bad after I became a Christian that I think I have lost my salvation. I'm
really scared. I don't want to go to hell but I fear that is my fate. Please
help me.
Yes, it is possible to lose your
salvation. There are many places in the Bible that warn of this happening.
However, if you truly repent all is not lost. The fact that you are deeply
concerned is a positive sign. I suggest that you make earnest confession to the
Lord of your sins and believe that
He will forgive them and reestablish
you.
9-4
What is the meaning of "progressive sanctification"?
Paul writes: "Beloved, let us
cleanse ourselves from all defilement of flesh and spirit, perfecting holiness
in the fear of God" (2 Corinthians 7:1). In one sense every born-again
believer has already been sanctified, "You were
washed…sanctified…justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ, and in the
Spirit of our God" (1 Corinthians 6:11).
It is against the background of this
initial sanctification in salvation that we are called upon to devote ourselves
to ongoing sanctification. Whatever remains in the carnal self we should find intolerable
and seek both cleansing and removal. Paul again speaks elsewhere "by the
[indwelling] Spirit put to death the deeds of the body" (Romans 8:13). We
cannot put to death the flesh in our own strength, but by the power of the Holy
Spirit we can-if we are really serious about it. Day by day there can be
progress in sanctification, and living a life more pleasing to our Lord.
9-5
Can a Christian lose his/her salvation?
The security of our salvation rests not
in ourselves but in God. He has given us a new life in Christ and the Holy
Spirit dwells in us. Thus there is strong security from God's side; the undergirding of salvation is His doing not ours. We should
not therefore be anxious as if some slip on our part will quickly cost us our
salvation.
No, "If we confess our sins, He is
faithful and righteous to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all
unrighteousness" (1 John 1:9). However, salvation may be lost. There are
grave warnings in Scripture, for example, Jesus' own words: "If anyone
does not abide in Me, he is thrown away as a branch, and dries up; and they
gather them, and cast them into the fire, and they are burned" (John
15:6).
Again, "If we go on sinning
willfully after receiving the knowledge of the truth, there no longer remains a
sacrifice for sins, but a certain terrifying judgment and the fury of a fire
which will consume…"(Hebrews 10:26). Our security is truly in God;
however, all may be lost if we fail to abide in Christ and go on willfully
sinning. For other warnings in Scripture relating to believers, read 1
Corinthians 10:12; Colossians 1:21-23; Hebrews 2:1-3, 3:12-14, 6:4-8; 2 Peter
2:20-22
9-6
If you have been saved, but you sin every day-some you think
worse than others, can you lose your salvation if you pray and ask for
forgiveness every day?
Salvation may be lost only by those who
persistently and willfully go on sinning. If a person genuinely seeks God's
forgiveness and His way, salvation will not be lost.
9-7
So is our security in us or God for maintaining our salvation?
You said our security is in God-but then you said if we go on sinning we will
lose our salvation. It sounds to me that our security is based on us and
whether we sin or not-not in God as you say. For if it were up to God, he would
never let us go.
Our security is in God means that it is
not primarily a matter of our achieving such by our own efforts. If that were
the case, we would never be secure. However, we may forfeit that security by
our own apostasy.
9-8
Could you please explain Hebrews 6:4-6?
This passage points up the ominous fact
that even full-fledged believers-"those who have once been enlightened and
have tasted of the heavenly gift and have been made partakers of the Holy
Spirit, and have tasted the good word of God and the power of the age to
come"-if they "then have fallen away, it is impossible to renew them
again to repentance." Why? "Since they again crucify to themselves
the Son of God, and put Him to open shame." The falling away is total;
there is no hope of repentance. The end is "being burned" (verse 8).
Compare Hebrews 10:26-27-"If we go on sinning
willfully after receiving the knowledge
of the truth, there no longer remains a sacrifice for sins, but a certain
terrifying expectation of judgment." A tragic end: "impossible to
renew them again to repentance"-"no longer remains a sacrifice for
sins"-total loss. Little wonder that Hebrews earlier says: "How shall
we escape if we neglect so great a salvation?" (2:3).
9-9 What is the meaning of
"sinning willfully" in Hebrews 10:26?
The word "willfully" (Greek-ekousias) may also be translated as
"deliberately." The Amplified Bible includes both translations:
"If we go on deliberately and willfully sinning…." The point made in
Hebrews is that by willfully, deliberately, persistently continuing to sin
"after receiving the knowledge of the truth, there no longer remains a
sacrifice for sins, but a certain terrifying expectation of judgment."
First, as Christian believers we should ever
move forward, rejoicing in our great salvation. Since God delights to forgive,
when we turn to Him in sincere confession, He will surely cleanse us from all
unrighteousness and establish our way. Second, we should give serious heed to
the New Testament
warnings about possible falling away.
These warnings are declared not to create fear and anxiety, but they are God's
counsel not to neglect what has been so graciously given us. Third, we can
continually give thanks to God for what He has done and intends to do. He is
fully able to keep us to the very end. To God be the glory!
10.
The Holy Spirit
10-1
We see from Acts 2:38, 39 that the promise for the baptism of
the Holy Spirit is for all that are called of God, that is for every believer.
The evidence of that Holy Spirit baptism was tongues in Acts 2, 10, 19. Mark
16:17 says that one of the signs is tongues, and Paul clearly said that he
spoke in tongues more than all of the Corinthian Church (1 Corinthians 14:18).
It seems clear to me that this is a serious Bible doctrine. Paul said that if
anyone preaches another gospel than the gospel he preaches let him be accursed.
What is your opinion?
I heartily agree with your statement
above of biblical doctrine about baptism of the Holy Spirit and speaking in
tongues. However, I deem it unfortunate that you seem to equate this biblical
doctrine with the gospel of salvation that Paul preached and taught so
vigorously. Otherwise, your statement about the baptism of the Holy Spirit and
speaking in tongues is well put.
10-2
I was told that if a person did not have the Holy Spirit, he
would not make it into heaven. Is that true? I know people who have accepted
Christ as their Lord and Savior but have not asked for the infilling of the
Holy Spirit. I have the Holy Spirit, but it haunts me to think that saved
people can still go to hell.
It is true that if a person does not have
the Holy Spirit, he will not make it to heaven. For every born-again believer
has the Holy Spirit dwelling within him and is thereby saved. The infilling of
the Holy Spirit is a different matter. Not all believers have received it-a
reality not for salvation but that makes for a fuller Christian life and
ministry. So do not be anxious about saved people going to hell because they do
not have the infilling of the Holy Spirit.
10-3
My church believes that you have to speak in tongues to have
the Holy Spirit. Is this correct?
Your church's faith as described is
entirely backwards. It is the other way around: you have to have the Holy
Spirit to speak in tongues.
10-4
What should Pentecost mean to me?
Pentecost is both a historic and
contemporary event. Historically, it first occurred on the Day of Pentecost
with some 120 persons being baptized in the Holy Spirit. They were believers in
Christ before being baptized in the Holy Spirit. Today, Pentecost occurs again
and again with believers who are open to receive it. History, thereby, becomes
a living reality!
10-5
How do you know when you have received the Holy Spirit? Do you
receive it the minute you are born again? Do you receive it when you are
baptized with water? I have been born again, but when people ask have I
received the Holy Spirit, I honestly don't know. I know that God loves me and
is with me, but I have never spoken in tongues.
In salvation, the Holy Spirit comes to
dwell within the Christian. In this sense, you have received the Holy Spirit
the moment you were born again. Baptism in water is a sign of the cleansing
that the Holy Spirit brings in salvation and new life. The reception of the
Holy Spirit refers also to a further experience of the Holy Spirit's filling
known as the baptism in the Holy Spirit. Speaking in tongues is a sign of this
having occurred. The basic thing here is the Spirit's filling for which you may
ask as a child of God.
Hear the words of Jesus: "And I say
unto you, ask, and it shall be given to you; seek, and you shall find; knock,
and it shall be opened to you. For everyone who asks, receives; and he who
seeks, finds; and to him who knocks, it shall be opened….If you then, being
evil, know how to give good gifts to
your children, how much more shall your
Heavenly Father give the Holy Spirit to those who ask Him?" (Luke 11:9-10,
13). If God is your Father by virtue of your faith in Jesus, you may ask for
the gift of the Holy Spirit. By persistence in asking, seeking, and knocking,
you may be sure that God delights to give the Spirit to the ardent seeker.
10-7
How do I explain the difference in receiving the Holy Spirit
at the time you are saved and the baptism of the Holy Spirit? I struggle with
explaining this to people who insist that we receive the Holy Spirit at
salvation.
At the time of salvation, the Holy Spirit
comes to dwell within. For example, the risen Christ breathed on the disciples
and said, "Receive the Holy Spirit" (John 20:22). At Pentecost, there
came about a later experience of the disciples being baptized in the Holy
Spirit, primarily for ministry in the power of the Holy Spirit (Acts 1:5-8 and
2:4). Two separate experiences: one for enlivening by the Holy Spirit for
salvation; the other for empowering by the Holy Spirit. We need both!
10-8
My husband and I have been on a quest with the Lord to see Him
and know Him more. We have both received the Baptism of the Holy Spirit. We
both speak in tongues. What do you think it is? Is it a language that only
God can understand? Our church is in much turmoil and part of it is over
doctrinal differences. The pastor believes that all the gifts died with the
apostles. Whom do we believe? We are reading our Bibles but still are not sure.
Please
help
us. We want to be in God's will.
It is a joy to know that you both have received
the Holy Spirit and speak in tongues. Speaking in tongues is a language known
only to God. As Paul says, "For one who speaks in a tongue does not speak
to men, but to God" (1 Corinthians 14:2). On the matter of the gifts of
the Spirit: there is no
reason to believe, biblically or
experientially, that they died with the apostles. If you want to be in God's
will, continue to seek all the spiritual gifts (1 Corinthians 12-14). You will
be blessed!
10-9
I have received the Baptism of the Holy Spirit and I want so
badly to serve God in my Presbyterian church, but neither of my pastors is at
all open to the whole idea. They have made it very clear that we will not have
that kind of thing happening in our church. There is a group of 15-20 people
who all have had the same experience and have stayed in the church. We are all
frustrated and have no idea how to proceed. Do you have any suggestions? The
church
has about 500 members.
Show yourselves all the more loving and
kind toward those who oppose you. So long as the pastors allow you to stay,
reach out to them in a spirit of cooperation. Though you may as a group meet
separately at times, do not isolate yourselves from the wider church family. By
all means, do not give
the impression of being a superior group
from the rest of the church but demonstrate humility in all things. And may the
joy of the Lord be your strength!
Previously
you answered a question regarding the baptism in the Holy Spirit and about how
one doesn't necessarily have to be baptized in the Holy Spirit to enter the
kingdom of Heaven. How can you say we don't need it, when it's the most
important necessity in our journey? In John 3:5 Jesus declared "I tell
you the truth, no one can enter the kingdom of God unless he is born of water
and of the Spirit." Peter also spoke about it in Acts 2.
Baptism in the Holy Spirit is not for the
purpose of salvation; rather it refers to a special empowering of the Holy
Spirit for those who have already been saved. Being born of the Spirit is
background and condition for being baptized in the Spirit. You are right about
the basic importance of being born of water and the Spirit whereby we enter the
kingdom of God. The first disciples were baptized in the Spirit on the Day of
Pentecost (Acts 2) with power to bear witness to the gospel. They had already
been born again several weeks earlier (John 20:22). So the distinction
continues to this day.
10-10
I would like to know if it is required for someone to be sanctified
(a second work of grace) before receiving the baptism of the Holy Spirit.
There is no biblical evidence for
sanctification as a second work of grace before receiving the baptism in the
Holy Spirit.
10-11
I am a "confused" Pentecostal. I have a desire to
serve God, but I hear that to serve Him effectively I need to be baptized in
the Holy Spirit, or to receive a second blessing. When you read the likes of
Packer, Carson, etc., they seem to have good arguments against this second
blessing. Where does a committed Christian go to find out who's right and
who's wrong?
I think you may find my
three-volumes-in-one Renewal Theology helpful -- especially volume two, my
chapters on the Holy Spirit. Also, see my home page on CBN.com for articles and
papers of mine on the subject. Blessings on your search!
10-12
I've studied a lot about Charismatic theology as well as the
Third Wave theology. What is your response to the Third Wave theology
concerning the Baptism in the Holy Spirit? Do you agree with them or disagree
and why?
I have concerns about Third Wave theology
in that it fails to affirm a distinct Baptism in the Holy Spirit. The emphasis
of Third Wave is almost totally on certain gifts of the Holy Spirit. By playing
down the power dimension, I believe that there is a diminution in the
effectiveness of the gifts. The Baptism in the Holy Spirit is more than
conversion; it is an empowering for ministry.
10-13
Is the baptism of the Holy Spirit automatic? Somebody used the
baptism of Jesus at the Jordan River to affirm this, but I disagreed. What do
you have to say?
There is nothing automatic about being
baptized in the Holy Spirit. Jesus Himself was the forerunner by being baptized
in the Holy Spirit at the Jordan River. Years later, after His resurrection, He
told the disciples, "You shall be baptized with the Holy Spirit not many
days from now" and "you shall receive power when the Holy Spirit has
come upon you and you shall be My witnesses…" (Acts 1: 5, 8).
Again, there was nothing automatic about
this happening. The disciples waited and prayed expectantly for ten days, and
as a climax to their waiting and prayers the Holy Spirit came in power upon
them. So it remains to this day. God gives the Holy Spirit in power to
expectant believers to enable them better to share in the mission of Christ.
The Holy Spirit is God. All the
attributes of full deity are possessed by Him. He is also within the mystery of
the Godhead a distinct person from the Father and the Son. As one of our hymns
puts it: "God in three persons, blessed Trinity."
10-15
If as a born-again Christian you already received the Holy
Spirit, why is it that some Christians pray and ask for God to fill them with
His Spirit if they already have it?
Filling with the Holy Spirit is both a
point in time action as well as a continuing experience. It can be repeated.
Paul writes, "Be filled [the Greek word means 'continuously filled'] with
the Spirit" (Ephesians 5:18). Actually, there are never times that we do
not need to be refilled.
Therefore, you may well pray, "God,
fill me again and again."
10-16
Could you please explain John 20:22 where Jesus breathed on
the disciples and told them to receive the Holy Spirit. If they received the
Holy Spirit at that point, why were they told in Acts 1:4 to tarry in Jerusalem
until the Holy Spirit was outpoured?
When Jesus breathed on the disciples and
told them to receive the Holy Spirit, He thereby imparted new life and
salvation. This occasion marked the beginning of new life from the risen Lord
whereby the Holy Spirit came to dwell within them: their regeneration. The
command in Acts 1:4-5 refers to a
later occasion when the Holy Spirit was promised to give power to the disciples for witness about Christ. The initial reception of the Holy Spirit recorded i